On Wednesday 18 October 2006 03:02, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Time to learn the rules of English pronunciation, then. This may help:
>
> http://mipmip.org/tidbits/pronunciation.shtml
That's nice. :) I definately find myself predisposed to pronounce the "Py"
as "pie", and I find that hard to get
Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
> But that's just about the name. The original motivation for my
> post about Cheeseshop, is that it would be nice if it were easier
> to find packages in it. The issue of search/navigation/access
> seems to have been forgotten in this flurry about the name.
The package serve
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Given that it is *generated* code, I find that very
> reasonable. Just fix the generator once, and the
> warnings will go away.
I don't accept that the code generator needs to be
"fixed", because I don't regard it as broken. The
code it generates is perfectly correct. Its
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Talin wrote:
> Seriously, though - this is actually my way of saying that this thread
> has gone too long...what are we hoping to accomplish here? Are you
> really going to re-name PyPI or cheeseshop or whatever you want to call
> it, or are folks just trying to score points? E
Terry Reedy wrote:
> Pie/Pi/Py/Pyeshop -- pun intended
'PyeShoppe' brings back fond Renaissance Faire memories :)
-- Talin
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.
Hi,
Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 October 2006 05:00, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > I must say I was surprised people found potential confusion between PyPy
> > and PyPI, though. I'd always pronounced the latter as Py-Pea-Eye (and it
> > was a tool for finding useful Python packages, so t
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Greg Ewing wrote:
>
>> If it's okay to use a silly name for the whole
>> project, why not for part of its infrastructure?
>
> because it's difficult enough to do a Python elevator pitch as it is ?
>
> (why is a package index so different from things like "documentation"
>
