Ron Adam wrote:
> Splits the item and it's formatter. The alignment is more of a
> container property or feild property as you pointed out further down.
>
> So maybe if you group the related values together...
>
> {valuespec:format, alignment:width}
>
> This has a nice dictionary feel and
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 07:40 PM 7/31/2007 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>>> In other words, a class' metaclass has to be a derivative of all
>>> its bases' metaclasses; ISTM that a __prepare__ namespace needs to
>>> be a derivative in some sense of all its bases' __prepa
Talin wrote:
> I had a long discussion with Guido today, where he pointed out numerous
> flaws and inconsistencies in my PEP that I had overlooked. I won't go
> into all of the details of what he found, but I'd like to focus on what
> came out of the discussion. I'm going to be updating the PE
I had a long discussion with Guido today, where he pointed out numerous
flaws and inconsistencies in my PEP that I had overlooked. I won't go
into all of the details of what he found, but I'd like to focus on what
came out of the discussion. I'm going to be updating the PEP to
incorporate the l
Fred Drake wrote:
> Would you consider weakkeydict and weakvaluedict better than
> WeakKeyDict and WeakValueDict?
I like WeakKeyDict and WeakValDict because the existing names
seem excessively long-winded, given that 'dict' or 'Dict' is
a well-established abbreviation.
But I actually think that
On Aug 1, 2007, at 12:55 AM, hashcollision wrote:
> I think that WeakKeyDictionary and should be renamed to WeakKeyDict
> (same with WeakValueDictionary). This will make it consistent with
> dict and collections.defaultdict.
Hmm. I'm not opposed to providing new names for these classes if
t
