Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You develop for 2.6, and then make sure it runs on 3.0 -
>> *exactly* the same as for 2.5/2.6.
>
> Uh... no. You develop for 2.5, and then you don't do anything else. It
> *will* run under 2.
trunk r61823 now compiles binascii to use zlib's crc32 rather than its own
if the zlib library is available at compile time (that should shave a
kilobyte off binascii.so on most systems).
{binascii,zlib}.crc32, zlib.adler32 and binascii.crc_hqx could all
potentially live in the hashlib module but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 23, 2008, at 7:36 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I finished my first round of porting Django to 3.0, and summarized my
> experience at
>
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/PortingDjangoTo3k
>
> If you have any comments, please let me know.
Note that t
I finished my first round of porting Django to 3.0, and summarized my
experience at
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PortingDjangoTo3k
If you have any comments, please let me know.
Regards,
Martin
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://m
>> If you add __future__ imports to the 2.6 code, it will stop running
>> on 2.5. Does that make it "not backwards compatible", or "not forwards
>> compatible".
>
> That makes it not backwards compatible, and it makes it forwards compatible.
Just to get the terminology straight:
Python x.y is
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Fair enough. But doesn't 2.5->2.6 present the same problem? After all,
> >> you can't start using 2.6 feature
> This probably belongs on spambayes-dev as much as here (although maybe
> someone here will tell me that 2.2 and 3.0 will be fine), but perhaps
> SpamBayes 1.2 (2.0?) could require 2.4 or 2.5?
I can't talk about 2.2, but my experience with Django suggests that
support 2.3..3.0 is feasible. It's a
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Fair enough. But doesn't 2.5->2.6 present the same problem? After all,
>> you can't start using 2.6 features until everyone is using it, right?
>
> No, but you can start using 2.6 before everyone
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fair enough. But doesn't 2.5->2.6 present the same problem? After all,
> you can't start using 2.6 features until everyone is using it, right?
No, but you can start using 2.6 before everyone is using it, since 2.6
is backw
(Diverting from python-3000 to spambayes-dev.)
Skip> After the next SpamBayes release I plan to branch the code and
Skip> work on porting it to Python 3.0, mostly as an experiment in
Skip> porting code from Python 2.x to 3.x whose results I can feed back
Skip> to the larger Python
Tony Meyer wrote:
> Hi Skip!
>
> [Skip]
>>> After the next SpamBayes release I plan to branch the code and work on
>>> porting it to Python 3.0, mostly as an experiment in porting code from
>>> Python 2.x to 3.x whose results I can feed back to the larger Python
>>> community.
>
> Cool :)
>
>>>
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:51:04 +0100
"Lennart Regebro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In many other cases, this is not how code is developed. Both within
> larger organisations and within large communities like Zope and Plone
> (and I suspect the same is true for communities such as Turbogears and
> Dj
Hi Skip!
[Skip]
>> After the next SpamBayes release I plan to branch the code and work on
>> porting it to Python 3.0, mostly as an experiment in porting code from
>> Python 2.x to 3.x whose results I can feed back to the larger Python
>> community.
Cool :)
>> I'm curious about how best to appro
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, can some Bazaar expert offer a suggestion as to how a
> non-developer with read-only access would best use the Bazaar
> repositories to maintain a number of patches to be posted to the
> tracker?
>
Here's what
(To provide counterweight.)
-On [20080320 20:44], Barry Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>We have not made a decision to move to Bazaar officially, nor have we made
>a decision to even move off of Subversion.
Good, because between this now and pytz the other 63 projects I follow use
Subversion o
15 matches
Mail list logo
