On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Atsuo Ishimoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
2. If you don't want any non-ASCII printed to a file, set the file's
encoding to ASCII and the error handler to backslashescape.
>>
>
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 2. If you don't want any non-ASCII printed to a file, set the file's
>>> encoding to ASCII and the error handler to backslashescape.
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> S
> Le jeudi 22 mai 2008 à 10:55 -0700, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
>> Is this thread reaching a conclusion yet? I am hoping I can soon
>> accept some variant of the following:
>>
>> 1. repr() returns a Unicode string containing only printable Unicode
>> characters, using \x\u\U escapes for characters
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:41:34PM +0200, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
>> Would "encoding/errorhandler" sound like a useful syntax?
>
> encoding:errorhandler
Whichever character is guaranteed never to be part of an encoding
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:41:34PM +0200, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
> Would "encoding/errorhandler" sound like a useful syntax?
encoding:errorhandler
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmannhttp://phd.pp.ru/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without
> Is Martin's proposal to allow forcing the default stdin/stdout/stderr
> encodings through environment variables related? (It should allow for
> setting the error handler too.)
It's related only if it supports setting the error handler as well.
Would "encoding/errorhandler" sound like a useful s
> The Unicode consortium usually uses the terms "UCS2" and "UCS4"
> when referring to Unicode as "character set", but even there
> you have an ordering which makes it an encoding.
The Unicode consortium uses the term "coded character set" to describe
the assignment of characters in the set to numb
Le jeudi 22 mai 2008 à 10:55 -0700, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> Hi folks,
>
> Is this thread reaching a conclusion yet? I am hoping I can soon
> accept some variant of the following:
>
> 1. repr() returns a Unicode string containing only printable Unicode
> characters, using \x\u\U escapes for c
On 2008-05-22 19:55, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Hi folks,
Is this thread reaching a conclusion yet? I am hoping I can soon
accept some variant of the following:
1. repr() returns a Unicode string containing only printable Unicode
characters, using \x\u\U escapes for characters that are not
conside
On 2008-05-22 19:52, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg writes:
> On 2008-05-22 13:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > M.-A. Lemburg egenix.com> writes:
> >> It's all a matter of perspective. You can say you're encoding Latin-1
> >> to Unicode, or you can say your encoding Unicode to Latin-1
Hi folks,
Is this thread reaching a conclusion yet? I am hoping I can soon
accept some variant of the following:
1. repr() returns a Unicode string containing only printable Unicode
characters, using \x\u\U escapes for characters that are not
considered printable according to some version of the
M.-A. Lemburg writes:
> On 2008-05-22 13:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > M.-A. Lemburg egenix.com> writes:
> >> It's all a matter of perspective. You can say you're encoding Latin-1
> >> to Unicode, or you can say your encoding Unicode to Latin-1.
> >
> > Except that Latin-1 is an encoding wh
On 2008-05-22 13:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg egenix.com> writes:
It's all a matter of perspective. You can say you're encoding Latin-1
to Unicode, or you can say your encoding Unicode to Latin-1.
Except that Latin-1 is an encoding while Unicode is not. So I don't see how you
can e
M.-A. Lemburg egenix.com> writes:
>
> It's all a matter of perspective. You can say you're encoding Latin-1
> to Unicode, or you can say your encoding Unicode to Latin-1.
Except that Latin-1 is an encoding while Unicode is not. So I don't see how you
can encode to Unicode. Of course you can enco
Hi,
just a quick announcement that I finished the port of the Cython compiler to
Py3. While you cannot currently run Cython itself in Py3, you can build the
generated C sources unchanged under Py2.3 through 3.0a5.
http://cython.org/
There isn't a release yet (though there will hopefully be o
15 matches
Mail list logo
