Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] 3.1 focus (was Re: for __future__ import planning)

2008-10-04 Thread Facundo Batista
2008/10/4 Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > So the mailing list is a good idea. Perhaps it should just be > python-porting so that it can also be used for people who have > problems with minor releases? +1. I'd try to help on that list, also. -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.a

Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] 3.1 focus (was Re: for __future__ import planning)

2008-10-04 Thread Brett Cannon
[replying to both Georg and Martin] On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:17 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, since for >95% of the (potential) Py3k users it is more important than >> e.g. the import rewrite in Python (no stab at you intended, Brett), it is >> something someone will h

Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] 3.1 focus (was Re: for __future__ import planning)

2008-10-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> Well, since for >95% of the (potential) Py3k users it is more important than > e.g. the import rewrite in Python (no stab at you intended, Brett), it is > something someone will have to get around to doing. > > I'm not excusing myself; in fact, I'd be happy to work on this, but overall > the tea

Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] 3.1 focus (was Re: for __future__ import planning)

2008-10-04 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Barry Warsaw schrieb: >> On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> >>> So now that we've released 2.6 and are working hard on shepherding 3.0 >>> out the door, it's time to worry about the next set of releases.