Re: [Python-3000] sizeof(size_t) < sizeof(long)

2008-04-16 Thread David Cournapeau
Greg Ewing wrote: > > If a word is needed for this concept, then invent a new > one, e.g. "size unit", rather than reusing "byte", which > everyone already understands as meaning 8 bits. > Maybe everyone understands it as 8 bits, but it has always been wrong. Byte is a unit of storage, which o

Re: [Python-3000] sizeof(size_t) < sizeof(long)

2008-04-16 Thread David Cournapeau
Greg Ewing wrote: > > Blarg. Well, I think the wording of that part of the > standard is braindamaged. The word "byte" already has > a pre-existing meaning outside of C, and the C standard > shouldn't be redefining it for its own purposes. > > This is like a financial document that defines "dollar"