On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 01:20:02AM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> It's not quite the same thing, anyway. What I had in mind was
> attaching the handler itself directly to the file descriptor, rather
> than going through a signal number. That way, different piece of code
> can use the mechanism independ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> (BTW, I actually think this sort of functionality should be part of
> the OS kernel, with event-driven programs and libraries being so
> important nowadays. Sort of like being able to define signal handlers
> for file descriptors instead of having a small, fixed number of
