-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 16, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I think it's definitely too short. Martin has outlined a clean
solution to this
but it's a lot of changes. Let's wait for beta 3.
FWIW, I started writing code today. I couldn't complete it, eit
> I think it's definitely too short. Martin has outlined a clean solution to
> this
> but it's a lot of changes. Let's wait for beta 3.
FWIW, I started writing code today. I couldn't complete it, either (i.e.
it's for 2.6 only, has no docs, and only fixes a single function), but I
hope to submit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 16, 2008, at 4:41 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Barry Warsaw python.org> writes:
But 3139 appears important enough to hold up beta 2.
http://bugs.python.org/issue3139
bytearrays are not thread safe
Can we get this fixed by tomorrow? Does any
Hi,
Barry Warsaw python.org> writes:
> But 3139 appears important enough to hold up beta 2.
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue3139
> bytearrays are not thread safe
>
> Can we get this fixed by tomorrow? Does anybody disagree that we
> should hold up the release for this one? We don't have mu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
But 3139 appears important enough to hold up beta 2.
http://bugs.python.org/issue3139
bytearrays are not thread safe
Can we get this fixed by tomorrow? Does anybody disagree that we
should hold up the release for this one? We don't have much tim
