Re: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization

2006-12-19 Thread Brett Cannon
On 12/18/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/19/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As for using a lib-old idea, is that for Python 2.x to help transition, > or did you want to do that for Py3K as well? I see the logic in the former > to help transition but in the

Re: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization

2006-12-18 Thread Thomas Wouters
On 12/19/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As for using a lib-old idea, is that for Python 2.x to help transition, or did you want to do that for Py3K as well? I see the logic in the former to help transition but in the latter. Development-transition only. I want to start doing it

Re: [Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization

2006-12-18 Thread Brett Cannon
On 12/18/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/18/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg > we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules > that don't conform to the current mo

[Python-3000] Moving forward: library reorganization

2006-12-18 Thread Thomas Wouters
On 12/18/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules that don't conform to the current module/package naming convention, like StringIO, cPickle or UserDict