On 12/18/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/19/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As for using a lib-old idea, is that for Python 2.x to help transition,
> or did you want to do that for Py3K as well? I see the logic in the former
> to help transition but in the
On 12/19/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As for using a lib-old idea, is that for Python 2.x to help transition, or
did you want to do that for Py3K as well? I see the logic in the former to
help transition but in the latter.
Development-transition only. I want to start doing it
On 12/18/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/18/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg
> we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules
> that don't conform to the current mo
On 12/18/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg
we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules
that don't conform to the current module/package naming convention,
like StringIO, cPickle or UserDict