On Sat, 26 May 2007, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
> > NFKC might be a better choice than NFC for normalizing identifiers.
> > Do we really want "find()" (with the fi-ligature) and "find()"
> > (without the fi-ligature) to be two different functions?\
>
> Do we really want to allow ligatur
Ka-Ping Yee wrote:
> NFKC might be a better choice than NFC for normalizing identifiers.
> Do we really want "find()" (with the fi-ligature) and "find()"
> (without the fi-ligature) to be two different functions?\
Do we really want to allow ligatures at all?
--
Greg
__
NFKC might be a better choice than NFC for normalizing identifiers.
Do we really want "find()" (with the fi-ligature) and "find()"
(without the fi-ligature) to be two different functions?
Martin, is there a reason to prefer NFC over NFKC?
-- ?!ng
___
P
