> Being technical hacker types, we can cope with describing the ins and
> outs of how our code works, but are less sure on the motivations for
> stackless-style technologies as used in real-world applications :)
Continuations. Which in turn are useful in multiuser interactive
applications, among
On 10/23/06, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> >> Being technical hacker types, we can cope with describing the ins and
> >> outs of how our code works, but are less sure on the motivations for
> >> stackless-style technologies as used in real-world applications :)
> >
Talin wrote:
> Maybe the wrong list - but maybe the right discussion. Specifically,
> how much of the stackless technology should be adopted in Python3K?
Nowadays, I have moved to greenlet. It is a bare-bone implementation of
continuations, without channels, schedulers, ecc. It is fine for basi
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
>> Hi stackless-dev!
>>
>> As some of you might know, the PyPy project is aiming at including many
>> of stackless' features into its Python interpreter. Most of them are now
>> implemented and we're now working on the report we are writing fo
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> Hi stackless-dev!
>
> As some of you might know, the PyPy project is aiming at including many
> of stackless' features into its Python interpreter. Most of them are now
> implemented and we're now working on the report we are writing for the
> EU about this part of our
Hi stackless-dev!
As some of you might know, the PyPy project is aiming at including many
of stackless' features into its Python interpreter. Most of them are now
implemented and we're now working on the report we are writing for the
EU about this part of our work.
Being technical hacker types, w
