Re: [Python-3000] Python-3000 Digest, Vol 10, Issue 40

2006-12-19 Thread Guido van Rossum
Yes, please move this to python-dev. On 12/19/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Josiah Carlson wrote: > > > So think about what you think would make sense, perhaps propose it here, > > and/or write a PEP. > > here's the PEP: > >http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-Nov

Re: [Python-3000] Python-3000 Digest, Vol 10, Issue 40

2006-12-19 Thread Fredrik Lundh
Josiah Carlson wrote: > So think about what you think would make sense, perhaps propose it here, > and/or write a PEP. here's the PEP: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-November/004147.html also see mike's concretization here: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2

Re: [Python-3000] Python-3000 Digest, Vol 10, Issue 40

2006-12-19 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Dec 19, 2006, at 12:10 AM, Josiah Carlson wrote: >> I feel strongly that modules os, os.path, shutil, etc. that deal with >> files and paths need reorganizing. > > So think about what you think would make sense, perhaps propose it > here, > and/o

Re: [Python-3000] Python-3000 Digest, Vol 10, Issue 40

2006-12-18 Thread Guido van Rossum
On 12/18/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Edward C. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > > > Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg > > > we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules > > > th

Re: [Python-3000] Python-3000 Digest, Vol 10, Issue 40

2006-12-18 Thread Josiah Carlson
"Edward C. Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg > > we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules > > that don't conform to the current module/package naming convention, >

Re: [Python-3000] Python-3000 Digest, Vol 10, Issue 40

2006-12-18 Thread Edward C. Jones
Guido van Rossum wrote: > Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg > we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules > that don't conform to the current module/package naming convention, > like StringIO, cPickle or UserDict. I feel strongly that