Re: [Python-3000] Separating out CPython and core Python tests

2006-04-19 Thread Guido van Rossum
On 4/12/06, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > I agree that such a test suite would be helpful. I don't think it > > should wait for Python 3000. > > Possible plan: > > Add 'spec' or 'specification' or 'language', 'implementation',

Re: [Python-3000] Separating out CPython and core Python tests

2006-04-11 Thread Terry Reedy
"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > I agree that such a test suite would be helpful. I don't think it > should wait for Python 3000. Possible plan: Add 'spec' or 'specification' or 'language', 'implementation', and possibly 'support' subdirs to ...Lib/test. Put most test

Re: [Python-3000] Separating out CPython and core Python tests

2006-04-11 Thread Brett Cannon
On 4/11/06, John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Michael Chermside wrote: > [...] > > There's a related change that I would love to see. Currently, we > > have a large number of unit tests, but we have made no attempt to > > distinguish between python language tests, and CPy

Re: [Python-3000] Separating out CPython and core Python tests

2006-04-11 Thread John J Lee
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Michael Chermside wrote: [...] > There's a related change that I would love to see. Currently, we > have a large number of unit tests, but we have made no attempt to > distinguish between python language tests, and CPython implementation > tests. If we made such a distinction,

Re: [Python-3000] Separating out CPython and core Python tests

2006-04-11 Thread Guido van Rossum
On 4/11/06, Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/04/06 Michael Chermside said: > > > There's a related change that I would love to see. Currently, we > > have a large number of unit tests, but we have made no attempt to > > distinguish between python language tests, and CPython imp

Re: [Python-3000] Separating out CPython and core Python tests

2006-04-11 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 11/04/06 Michael Chermside said: > There's a related change that I would love to see. Currently, we > have a large number of unit tests, but we have made no attempt to > distinguish between python language tests, and CPython implementation > tests. If we made such a distinction, then PyPy, Jyth

[Python-3000] Separating out CPython and core Python tests

2006-04-11 Thread Michael Chermside
Neal Norwitz writes: > Py3k is a great opportunity to upgrade the existing tests. We know > they are incomplete and could do a better job testing. In some cases > like this, where we are looking to revamp a module. It would be great > to also beef up the tests. Hopefully a lot of that work, wil