Neal Norwitz wrote:
> What do we want to do with the current versionadded/versionchanged
> markups in the doc for 3k? Should we remove all references to 1.x
> changes? all 2.x changes? Keep them? all of them?
the right answer is of course to move the documentation over to an
environment that
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 19:19, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Noo! Javascript in the Python docs
> would be *insane*.
I can probably be convinced to use Python when it's ubiquitous in
browsers. ;-)
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
___
Python-3000
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 19:17, Aahz wrote:
> Die, evil scum.
:-)
Actually, I don't think what I had in mind would prevent Lynx users from being
able to access everything in the docs, except the ability to hide the older
version notes. There wouldn't be information that you couldn't acce
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
>>Hmm. I think a little bit of JavaScript would go a long way. ;-)
Noo! Javascript in the Python docs
would be *insane*.
--
Greg
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.py
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:47, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps for some, but I would expect that docs cluttered with 'New/changed
>> in 3.0' to be just as confusing for others. Perhaps we need two versions
>> of the docs: a Python x.y set and
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:47, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I am pretty sure that a large majority of people learning Python for the
> first time with Python 3 would prefer this. If Python3 is as successful
> as we might hope, new Pythoneers will become the majority.
Agreed. Those who are interes
On 12/19/06, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Neal Norwitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > What do we want to do with the current versionadded/versionchanged
> > markups in the doc for 3k? Should we remove all references to 1.x
> > changes? all 2.x chan
"Neal Norwitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What do we want to do with the current versionadded/versionchanged
> markups in the doc for 3k? Should we remove all references to 1.x
> changes? all 2.x changes? Keep them? all of them?
>
> Given we are trying to cl
On 12/19/06, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:03, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> > have all the doc be clean. My only concern is that it might be
> > confusing for people. Though my first guess is that it won't be any
> > more confusing than anything else w
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 16:03, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> have all the doc be clean. My only concern is that it might be
> confusing for people. Though my first guess is that it won't be any
> more confusing than anything else we do, so I'd prefer to see it
> cleaned up.
Remove them from the
What do we want to do with the current versionadded/versionchanged
markups in the doc for 3k? Should we remove all references to 1.x
changes? all 2.x changes? Keep them? all of them?
Given we are trying to clean things up, I think I'd prefer to remove
all the old references to 1.x/2.x changes.
11 matches
Mail list logo
