Terry Reedy wrote:
>"Aaron Bingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>>I'm confused. As far as I can see, a reserved prefix (the "py" or
>>"stdlib" package others have mentioned) is the only reliable way to
>>avoid naming conflicts with 3rd-party packages with a
On Thursday 2006-06-01 22:16, Mike Klaas wrote:
> Terry Reedy wrote:
> > Because you have to type it over and over.
>
> hmm, With the right context manager:
>
> import py
> with py as py:
> from gui import tkinker
> import net
> with net as net:
> import httplib
> imp
Greg Ewing wrote:
> What might be useful is an easier way of *explicitly*
> creating and using weak references.
>
> We already have WeakKeyDictionary and WeakValueDictionary
> which behave just like ordinary dicts except that they
> weakly reference things. I'm thinking it would be nice
> to have
dang, you posted before me :)
anyway, please check my implementation as well
http://sebulba.wikispaces.com/recipe+weakattr
i also included some demos.
anyway, i'd like to have this or the other weakattr implementation
included in weakref.py. it's a pretty useful feature to have in the stdlib,
fo
On 6/1/06, Michael Chermside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Collin Winter writes:
> > I've attached the benchmarks as a comment on the patch, but I'll
> > repeat them here. All times are usecs per loop.
> [statistics showing list is about 15% slower]
>
> My memory is fuzzy here. Can someone rep
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> On 1-jun-2006, at 17:44, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>I suppose that's at least partially not an issue at the moment
>>because you can only add stuff to existing packages through hacks. I
>>wouldn't touch libraries that inject themselves into existing
>>packages through .pth hacke
On 6/2/06, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ronald Oussoren wrote:> On 1-jun-2006, at 17:44, Brett Cannon wrote:>>I suppose that's at least partially not an issue at the moment>>because you can only add stuff to existing packages through hacks. I
>>wouldn't touch libraries that inject themselves in
"Aaron Bingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[me]
>>For the latter (2 above), I think those who want such mostly agree in
>>principle on a mostly two-level hierarchy with about 10-20 short names
>>for
>>the top-level, using the lib docs as a starting point for the
On 6/2/06, Talin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... it seems to me that there is a cross-linkage
> between the "reorganize standard library" task and the "refactor import
> machinery" task
Eventually, yes. As Brett pointed out, "reorganize the standard
library" stands on its own, and is intended t
Guido wrote:
> Because the (...) in a function call isn't a tuple.
>
> I'm with Oleg -- a[x, y] is *intentionally* the same as a[(x, y)].
> This is a feature; you can write
>
>t = x, y# or t = (x, y)
>
> and later
>
> a[t]
well is func((1,2,3)) the same as func(1,2,3)? no.
so why should
I'd like to suggest that we (at least briefly) re-consider the
decision that iterating over a mapping generates the keys, not the
(key, value) pairs. This was addressed somewhat in `PEP 234`_, with
the pros and cons basically being:
* From a purity standpoint, iterating over keys keeps the symmet
This was already considered and rejected. See PEP 3099.
On 6/2/06, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that we (at least briefly) re-consider the
> decision that iterating over a mapping generates the keys, not the
> (key, value) pairs. This was addressed somewhat in `
Steven Bethard writes:
> I'd like to suggest that we (at least briefly) re-consider the
> decision that iterating over a mapping generates the keys, not the
> (key, value) pairs.
I agree, now is the best time for reconsidering the decision.
My opinion on the matter itself is that I was unsure bef
Steven Bethard wrote:
> Note that even though the `Language Reference`_ defines mappings in
> terms of __len__, __getitem__, __setitem__, __delitem__ and __iter__,
> UserDict.DictMixin.update has to assume that all mappings have a
> .keys() method.
A slightly different proposal:
Add an iteritems(
14 matches
Mail list logo
