On 7/1/06, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/30/06, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 6/30/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 6/30/06, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't yet want to add "improve global" as a
> no-no to PEP 3099.
What about simply redefining it to mean "not local"?
No syntax change at all, and just a very small
semantic change.
--
Greg
___
Python-3000 mailing list
Python
On 7/3/06, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I don't yet want to add "improve global" as a
> > no-no to PEP 3099.
>
> What about simply redefining it to mean "not local"?
> No syntax change at all, and just a very small
> semantic change.
That can be debated. What