Dear All,
(I'm forwarding this from the main pydev mailing list)
I'm a Master's student at Imperial College London currently selecting
a Master's thesis subject. I am exploring the possibility of "optional
typing" and "pluggable type systems" (Bracha) for Python. Reading
around I see that the clo
Greg Ewing schrieb:
>> Given that it is *generated* code, I find that very
>> reasonable. Just fix the generator once, and the
>> warnings will go away.
>
> I don't accept that the code generator needs to be
> "fixed", because I don't regard it as broken. The
> code it generates is perfectly corre
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> If that is so, just ignore the warnings.
Not acceptable, because it means I have to examine
all the warnings every time I compile to check that
another one hasn't appeared that represents a real
problem.
> one way to solve the problem is to make the warnings
> go away.
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
> I agree that Make itself doesn't handle install-type
> operations very well. I think that's partly because
> it's too rigidly fixated on a target being a single
> file.
This isn't related to Py3K, except that it would solve a lot of problems
in Pyth
