Greg Ewing wrote:
> Jim Jewett wrote:
>
>> Knowing which i's to rename strikes *me* as tricky,
>
> It shouldn't be too hard if you approach it the
> right way. One way would be to temporarily change
> the symbol table entry for the loop var when
> compiling the loop body and any nested functions
Talin wrote:
> 1) What's the process for editing a PEP after it has been reviewed, but
> before its been accepted?
>
> I've recently had some requests to make some edits to the PEP. However,
> I don't want to do these in "stealth mode", like a congressional staffer
> who inserts changes into a
On 12/20/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/18/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg
> > we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuff; (b) rename modules
> > that don't conform to the current modul
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I personally find ElementTree.py a worse offender than simple_server.py
if you want consistency, you shouldn't change the style guide quite as
often ;-)
(when ET was written, the official style guide said "Module names can be
either MixedCase or lowercase. /.../ Modu
Brett Cannon a écrit :
> But compile (along wth exec, but I don't think you wanted to move that)
> are just plain different. Dynamic code execution is its own thing that
> I do not directly associate with the specifics of the interpreter.
> Maybe a module named 'dynamic' or 'execution'?
>
bt
On 12/21/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> not using underscores in package names makes a certain sense, but
> not allowing them in module names strikes me as misguided. what's
> the rationale?
See, I don't remember. :-)
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guid
On 12/21/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/21/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > not using underscores in package names makes a certain sense, but
> > not allowing them in module names strikes me as misguided. what's
> > the rationale?
>
> See, I don't remember.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 21, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
> On 12/21/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 12/21/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> not using underscores in package names makes a certain sense, but
>>> not allowing the
On 12/21/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/18/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ok, so be it. Let this be a pronouncement -- the only stdlib reorg
> > > we're doing will be (a) deleting silly old stuf
I am starting to compile the list of modules to suggest for removal and I
noticed that there are still a large number for platform-specific
directories in Lib/. I was wondering if we should consider some platforms
for removal.
The reason I am not sending this to python-dev is I figure we could p
Actually you *should* post this to python-dev. Let's be aggressive.
All of those look like we should've stopped supporting them years
ago... :-)
On 12/21/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am starting to compile the list of modules to suggest for removal and I
> noticed that there are
On 22 Dec, 2006, at 3:09, Brett Cannon wrote:
I am starting to compile the list of modules to suggest for removal
and I
noticed that there are still a large number for platform-specific
directories in Lib/. I was wondering if we should consider some
platforms
for removal.
The reason I am
12 matches
Mail list logo
