[Python-3000] An impassioned plea for true multithreading

I know this is probably futile, but I'm going to ask anyway. Since I have not the time (or ability) to code this, I am not even submitting a PEP. I'm throwing this out there on the wind. Since we're doing a lot of work that breaks backwards compatibility, one more piece of breakage

Re: [Python-3000] An impassioned plea for true multithreading

On Tuesday, June 26, 2007, at 08:49PM, "Chris Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know this is probably futile, but I'm going to ask anyway. >Since I have not the time (or ability) to code this, I am not even >submitting a PEP. I'm throwing this out there on the wind. > Since we

Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Python 3000 Status Update (Long!)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Russell E. Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ...one could make the argument that TOOTDI says that literals and > > > generators

Re: [Python-3000] An impassioned plea for true multithreading

Chris Spencer schrieb: > I know this is probably futile, but I'm going to ask anyway. > Since I have not the time (or ability) to code this, I am not even > submitting a PEP. I'm throwing this out there on the wind. Just to second Ronald's sentiment: it won't happen unless somebody does it,