On 7/7/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Collin, where did you find this code in setuptools, btw? I've been
> looking around at other packages of mine where static class
> initialization uses data structures like this, and I haven't found
> any place where anything but the "in" claus
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 01:08:15PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> "Nick Coghlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | Georg is correct. A list comprehension like:
> |
> | [(x * y) for x in seq1 for y in seq2]
> |
> | expands to the following in 2.x (% prefixes the comp
At 11:55 AM 7/8/2007 +0300, Collin Winter wrote:
>On 7/7/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Collin, where did you find this code in setuptools, btw? I've been
>>looking around at other packages of mine where static class
>>initialization uses data structures like this, and I haven't f
