Re: [Python-3000] Heaptypes

2007-07-13 Thread Martin v. Löwis
> I don't know enouch about ...CallFunction to help you with the rest. I wonder whether the "s" specifier in CallFunction, BuildValue etc should create Unicode objects, rather than str8 objects. Regards, Martin ___ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@p

Re: [Python-3000] pep 3124 plans

2007-07-13 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 07:39 AM 7/13/2007 +0200, Michele Simionato wrote: >But I want to ask your opinion first, in order to understand if you >are willing to scale down your proposal or not. At EuroPython Guido >said that in private mail you made some strong argument explaining >why the PEP could not be simplified

Re: [Python-3000] pep 3124 plans

2007-07-13 Thread Michele Simionato
Phillip J. Eby telecommunity.com> writes: > For what it's worth, the pkgutil > module already contains an even simpler generic function > implementation than simplegeneric, and is already in the stdlib > albeit undocumented. Well, that is good to know. Personally I would be content with someth

[Python-3000] pep3115 - metaclasses in python 3000

2007-07-13 Thread Thomas Heller
playing a little with py3k... pep3115 mentions that "__prepare__ returns a dictionary-like object which is used to store the class member definitions during evaluation of the class body." It does not mention whether this dict-like object is used afterwards as the class-dictionary of the created c

Re: [Python-3000] pep3115 - metaclasses in python 3000

2007-07-13 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 09:13 PM 7/13/2007 +0200, Thomas Heller wrote: >playing a little with py3k... > >pep3115 mentions that "__prepare__ returns a dictionary-like object >which is used to store the class member definitions during evaluation >of the class body." > >It does not mention whether this dict-like object is

Re: [Python-3000] pep3115 - metaclasses in python 3000

2007-07-13 Thread Talin
Thomas Heller wrote: > playing a little with py3k... > > pep3115 mentions that "__prepare__ returns a dictionary-like object > which is used to store the class member definitions during evaluation > of the class body." > > It does not mention whether this dict-like object is used afterwards > as