Re: [Python-3000] need help fixing broken tests in py3k-pep3137 branch

2007-11-05 Thread Christian Heimes
Guido van Rossum wrote: > In the py3k-pep3137 branch I've been working on the implementation of PEP > 3137. > The work is largely done, but I'm stuck with about 20 failing tests, > and very little time this weekend to work on these. Here's the list: Here is an updated list. 4 unit tests are faili

Re: [Python-3000] need help fixing broken tests in py3k-pep3137 branch

2007-11-05 Thread Bill Janssen
> > > 3. the ABC corresponding to buffer-API objects: MemoryBlock > > > > What do you think about RawData, RawBlock, RawView or RawSequence? From > > my point of view a PyBuffer allows me to access the raw data of a > > PyString or PyBytes. > > "Raw" has lots of different connotations (e.g. raw_in

Re: [Python-3000] need help fixing broken tests in py3k-pep3137 branch

2007-11-05 Thread Guido van Rossum
On 11/5/07, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 3. the ABC corresponding to buffer-API objects: MemoryBlock > > > > > > What do you think about RawData, RawBlock, RawView or RawSequence? From > > > my point of view a PyBuffer allows me to access the raw data of a > > > PyString or PyByt

Re: [Python-3000] need help fixing broken tests in py3k-pep3137 branch

2007-11-05 Thread Guido van Rossum
On 11/3/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > test_bsddb3 > > The big failure spewing out all of this stuff about an assert in > getGenre() failing is because the code in > Modules/_bsddb.c:_db_associateCallback() uses "y#' to build an > argument tuple when the test expects a bytes type a

Re: [Python-3000] need help fixing broken tests in py3k-pep3137 branch

2007-11-05 Thread Greg Ewing
Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > It's a list of > 'byte's rather than a list of 'bytes'es. Except maybe in Gollum's version of Python. -- Greg ___ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe:

Re: [Python-3000] need help fixing broken tests in py3k-pep3137 branch

2007-11-05 Thread Guido van Rossum
On 11/5/07, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > In the py3k-pep3137 branch I've been working on the implementation of PEP > > 3137. > > The work is largely done, but I'm stuck with about 20 failing tests, > > and very little time this weekend to work on these.

Re: [Python-3000] need help fixing broken tests in py3k-pep3137 branch

2007-11-05 Thread Guido van Rossum
Tests still failing on OSX (besides test_*mailbox, which are failing everywhere): test_aepack test_plistlib test_scriptpackages -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) ___ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://