Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 2:45 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Can you give me a link to that? I wasn't following the
>>discussion that closely.
>
> http://svn.python.org/view?rev=59469&view=rev
That's not quite what I had in mind -- Pyrex already solves
the problem
On Dec 12, 2007 3:06 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > On Dec 12, 2007 2:45 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Can you give me a link to that? I wasn't following the
> >>discussion that closely.
> >
> > http://svn.python.org/view?rev=59469&view=r
Greg Ewing wrote:
> I put forward a possible reason recently -- so that
> Pyrex-defined functions could be used as methods
> without requiring any special trickery.
http://svn.python.org/view?rev=59469&view=rev
PyObject *wrapped = PyInstanceMethod_New(PyObject *callable);
The API isn't exposed t
On Dec 12, 2007 2:45 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 6:10 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>I put forward a possible reason recently -- so that
> >>Pyrex-defined functions could be used as methods
> >>without requiring any spec
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 6:10 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I put forward a possible reason recently -- so that
>>Pyrex-defined functions could be used as methods
>>without requiring any special trickery.
>
>
> Would the new API that Christian just checked in hel
Dnia 12-12-2007, Śr o godzinie 15:10 +1300, Greg Ewing pisze:
> > > CFunction does not define descr_get - why?
> >
> > I don't see why we should bother.
>
> I put forward a possible reason recently -- so that
> Pyrex-defined functions could be used as methods
> without requiring any special tric
