-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> pickle should definitely remain part of the core; it is timed in lots
> of ways to core datatypes. It is also something that I expect nobody
> would be thrilled to maintain if it was separate. And there is a lot
> to say for h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Pickle always memoized objects. persistent_id is useful for
> separating data over multiple pickles as is done in a database. IOW,
> as its name implies, it is primarily useful for persistence systems.
> I don't think that
On Jan 10, 2008 4:52 AM, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm very dependent of bsddb support in python. I'm very sorry also of
> the maintainer support of it: he is slow and doesn't implement python
> bindings for berkeleydb features deployed five years ago :-(. Could be a
> bit rude, but ma
My apologies if this has been asked before, but are there any plans to
add the compiler module back in to py3k? If so, any idea on a
timeline? If help is needed I may be able to put in some time on
this. I've already back ported some of the py3k grammar (function
parameter annotations) to python
On Jan 10, 2008 8:39 AM, Joe Angell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies if this has been asked before, but are there any plans to
> add the compiler module back in to py3k? If so, any idea on a
> timeline? If help is needed I may be able to put in some time on
> this. I've already back por
On 1/10/08, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 4:52 AM, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm very dependent of bsddb support in python. I'm very sorry also of
> > the maintainer support of it: he is slow and doesn't implement python
> > bindings for berkeleydb f
On reading this pep, I was not clear on one issue.
In some interface proposals (zope?), as well as in c++0x concept proposal,
there is a mechanism to specify how to adapt a given class to satisfy given
interface requirements.
For example, suppose container ABC requires a 'size'. Suppose I have a
On Jan 10, 2008 11:20 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On reading this pep, I was not clear on one issue.
>
> In some interface proposals (zope?), as well as in c++0x concept proposal,
> there is a mechanism to specify how to adapt a given class to satisfy given
> interface requirements
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2008 11:20 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On reading this pep, I was not clear on one issue.
>>
>> In some interface proposals (zope?), as well as in c++0x concept
>> proposal, there is a mechanism to specify how to adapt a given class to
>> sati
On Jan 10, 2008 11:54 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > On Jan 10, 2008 11:20 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On reading this pep, I was not clear on one issue.
> >>
> >> In some interface proposals (zope?), as well as in c++0x concept
> >>
On Jan 10, 2008 8:39 AM, Joe Angell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies if this has been asked before, but are there any plans to
> add the compiler module back in to py3k? If so, any idea on a
> timeline? If help is needed I may be able to put in some time on
> this. I've already back por
How do you plan on letting third party tools utilize the new grammar?
Will they have to write their own parser then, or is there some kind
of plugin architecture?
Thanks,
joe
On Jan 10, 2008 10:34 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 8:39 AM, Joe Angell <[EMAIL PRO
On Jan 10, 2008 1:50 PM, Joe Angell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do you plan on letting third party tools utilize the new grammar?
Don't need to plan anything; people are already using the AST that
Python's compiler uses since 2.5 came out.
> Will they have to write their own parser then, or
Oh I see... forgive my ignorance but could you point me at some
documentation or a project that uses the c AST as you mentioned? Is
that done through some part of the C-API? I cannot find that in the
documentation at the moment.
Thank you,
joe
On Jan 10, 2008 2:56 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROT
On Jan 10, 2008 2:08 PM, Joe Angell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh I see... forgive my ignorance but could you point me at some
> documentation or a project that uses the c AST as you mentioned? Is
> that done through some part of the C-API? I cannot find that in the
> documentation at the momen
15 matches
Mail list logo
