Re: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Removing bsddb module from py3k (was Re: No beta2 tonight)

2008-07-24 Thread Josiah Carlson
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Josiah Carlson wrote: > | I'm still curious as to what deep features people are using in bsddb. > | Anyone have any pointers to open source software? > > I'm using replication

[Python-3000] distutils: usage of the 'map()' builtin breaks the parsing of MANIFEST.in

2008-07-24 Thread Lisandro Dalcin
In module 'distutils.filelist', class 'FileList', method '_parse_template_line()', the 'map()' builtin is being used. Now 'map()' returns an iterator, and this iterator is exhausted in other methods (for the purpose of 'debug_print()' stuff) before the data is actually used. I'm currently monkey-p

Re: [Python-3000] adding gamma and error functions to math module

2008-07-24 Thread nirinA raseliarison
on Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:46:03 -0500 "Daniel Stutzbach" wrote: > Also, the patch doesn't include the extensive comments in the original > code that explain the mathematics. Including a URL in the patch would > at least allow someone to find those comments. i rearranged the patches so that they are

[Python-3000] lib2to3 refactor.py has a lot of 2.6-isms

2008-07-24 Thread Robert Brewer
The README at http://svn.python.org/view/sandbox/trunk/2to3/README?rev=65003&view=auto says: "2to3 must be run (at the moment) with Python 2.x!" However, it doesn't even import under 2.5.2 because of print() statements, 'Exception as err', .relative imports, etc. Is this an attempt to make people

Re: [Python-3000] lib2to3 refactor.py has a lot of 2.6-isms

2008-07-24 Thread Raymond Hettinger
The intended upgrade path is through 2.6. If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get to go through a step with the -3 warnings and optional text/bytes annotations. IMO, it would be a mistake to create a 2.5 to 3.0 converter. Raymond - Original Message - From: "Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PR

Re: [Python-3000] lib2to3 refactor.py has a lot of 2.6-isms

2008-07-24 Thread Robert Brewer
Raymond Hettinger wrote: > The intended upgrade path is through 2.6. > If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get > to go through a step with the -3 warnings > and optional text/bytes annotations. > > IMO, it would be a mistake to create a 2.5 to 3.0 converter. > > - Original Message - >

Re: [Python-3000] lib2to3 refactor.py has a lot of 2.6-isms

2008-07-24 Thread Collin Winter
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Robert Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raymond Hettinger wrote: >> The intended upgrade path is through 2.6. >> If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get >> to go through a step with the -3 warnings >> and optional text/bytes annotations. >> >> IMO, it would be