On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Jesus Cea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
> | I'm still curious as to what deep features people are using in bsddb.
> | Anyone have any pointers to open source software?
>
> I'm using replication
In module 'distutils.filelist', class 'FileList', method
'_parse_template_line()', the 'map()' builtin is being used. Now
'map()' returns an iterator, and this iterator is exhausted in other
methods (for the purpose of 'debug_print()' stuff) before the data is
actually used.
I'm currently monkey-p
on Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:46:03 -0500
"Daniel Stutzbach" wrote:
> Also, the patch doesn't include the extensive comments in the original
> code that explain the mathematics. Including a URL in the patch would
> at least allow someone to find those comments.
i rearranged the patches so that they are
The README at
http://svn.python.org/view/sandbox/trunk/2to3/README?rev=65003&view=auto
says: "2to3 must be run (at the moment) with Python 2.x!" However, it
doesn't even import under 2.5.2 because of print() statements,
'Exception as err', .relative imports, etc.
Is this an attempt to make people
The intended upgrade path is through 2.6.
If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get
to go through a step with the -3 warnings
and optional text/bytes annotations.
IMO, it would be a mistake to create a 2.5 to 3.0 converter.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PR
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> The intended upgrade path is through 2.6.
> If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get
> to go through a step with the -3 warnings
> and optional text/bytes annotations.
>
> IMO, it would be a mistake to create a 2.5 to 3.0 converter.
>
> - Original Message -
>
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Robert Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>> The intended upgrade path is through 2.6.
>> If you go straight from 2.5, you don't get
>> to go through a step with the -3 warnings
>> and optional text/bytes annotations.
>>
>> IMO, it would be