On 2008-08-07 01:41, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:40 PM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-06-11 16:32, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
There are two things I'd like to get in to 3.0:
* .transform()/.untransform() methods (this is mostly done, just need
to add the me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 7, 2008, at 5:09 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Is it too late for that ?
That kind of depends on how far other 3rd party projects are in
porting their extensions to Py3k, and how much they've bought into
these APIs. I recall that mechanically tra
I'm trying to run the regression suite on a checkout of the Py3K trunk
my OS X 10.5 machine, and getting nowhere fast. First off,
test_audioop segfaults. After disabling that, I've been hanging in
test_bz2 for half an hour.
Should we be able to test the current codebase?
Bill
__
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2008, at 5:09 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
Is it too late for that ?
>>>
>>> That kind of depends on how far other 3rd party projects are in
>>> porting their extensions to Py3k, and how much they've bought into
On 2008-08-07 18:40, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 7, 2008, at 5:09 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Is it too late for that ?
That kind of depends on how far other 3rd party projects are in
porting their extensions to Py3k, and
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to run the regression suite on a checkout of the Py3K trunk
DO you mean the trunk (which is 2.6), or the py3k branch?
> my OS X 10.5 machine, and getting nowhere fast.
PPC or x86? For segfaults it might matter (
Sounds like a plan. Make sure it is prominently mentioned in Misc/NEWS.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:03 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-08-07 18:40, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 7, 2008, at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 7, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to run the regression suite on a checkout of the Py3K
trunk
DO you mean the trunk (which is 2.6), or the py3k
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to run the regression suite on a checkout of the Py3K trunk
>
> DO you mean the trunk (which is 2.6), or the py3k branch?
>
>> my OS X
> Both tests pass there, both in the trunk and in the py3k branch.
>
> Are you using a debug or a non-debug build?
Debug.
Bill
___
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to run the regression suite on a checkout of the Py3K trunk
>
> DO you mean the trunk (which is 2.6), or the py3k branch?
the py3k branch
> > my OS X 10.5 machine, and getting nowhere fast.
>
> PPC or x86?
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Both tests pass there, both in the trunk and in the py3k branch.
>>
>> Are you using a debug or a non-debug build?
>
> Debug.
Sometimes debug builds have additional problems, but these tests pass
for me in a debug build of
> I recommend "make distclean" and then ./configure --with-pydebug; make.
Yes, that's what I tried, and it seems to be rolling along now. I
must have had some stale bits there. Thanks!
Bill
___
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://ma
On 2008-08-07 19:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Sounds like a plan. Make sure it is prominently mentioned in Misc/NEWS.
Committed as r65582.
All tests pass except test_socket, but that appears to be related
to some quirk on my machine:
File "Lib/test/test_socket.py", line 365, in testGetServB
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:57 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-08-07 19:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like a plan. Make sure it is prominently mentioned in Misc/NEWS.
>
> Committed as r65582.
Thanks!
> All tests pass except test_socket, but that appears to be relat
On 2008-08-07 21:00, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:57 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-08-07 19:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Sounds like a plan. Make sure it is prominently mentioned in Misc/NEWS.
Committed as r65582.
Thanks!
All tests pass except tes
On 2008-08-07 21:01, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
On 2008-08-07 21:00, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:57 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-08-07 19:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Sounds like a plan. Make sure it is prominently mentioned in Misc/NEWS.
Committed as r6
Greg Ewing wrote:
> Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>
>> However, _sre relied on the module already being in
>> sys.modules, as it runs Python code in the init function that already
>> imports the module being initialized.
>
> This issue also potentially affects all Pyrex and Cython
> generated modu
18 matches
Mail list logo
