On 12/27/06, neal.norwitz wrote:
Remove PyFloat_AsReprString() and PyFloat_AsString() which should not
have been public due to passing buffers without lengths.
Should we do this for 2.6 as well? That is, leave them in under the old name
for binary compatibility, but #define them to a nonexis
Author: guido.van.rossum
Date: Thu Dec 28 22:03:31 2006
New Revision: 53171
Modified:
python/branches/p3yk/Python/import.c
Log:
Update the magic number now that signature annotations were added.
Modified: python/branches/p3yk/Python/import.c
===
Author: fred.drake
Date: Fri Dec 29 05:42:48 2006
New Revision: 53189
Modified:
python/branches/p3yk/Parser/asdl.py
python/branches/p3yk/Parser/spark.py
Log:
avoid dict.has_key, since this might get used by a Py3K built in the
working copy
Modified: python/branches/p3yk/Parser/asdl.py
On 12/28/06, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/06, neal.norwitz wrote:
> > Remove PyFloat_AsReprString() and PyFloat_AsString() which should not
> > have been public due to passing buffers without lengths.
>
> Should we do this for 2.6 as well? That is, leave them in under t
