Changes by Andrew McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +andrewmcnamara
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3747
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Gregory P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
this is ready for more review at http://codereview.appspot.com/3641
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11341/threading_local4.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes by Ezio Melotti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3672
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Adam Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Marc, I don't understand what you're saying. UTF-16's surrogates are
not optional. Unicode 2.0 and later require them, and Python is
supposed to support it.
Likewise, UCS-4 originally allowed a much larger range of code points,
but it no longer
Adam Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I've got another report open about the codecs not properly reporting
errors relating to surrogates: issue 3672
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3297
Legoll Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Vincent,
GPL licenced code is incompatible with the inclusion into python.
And if I am correct, you
Adi [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Is there any progress on this bug? I am currently considering
maintaining a branch of 2.5.2 which includes the patch suggested by effbot.
--
nosy: +adi
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks!
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3352
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Can you try this patch?
1. used file -b option to eliminate file path. Otherwide, re.split
won't work because file path will contain space like this. (I hope -b
option can be used anywhere file command exists)
a b/python.exe: MS-DOS
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
[off topic]
I used cygwin to create this patch, but platform.architecture()[1]
becomes empty string because sys.executable in cygwin points to
directory. (at least before installing)
Python 2.6b3+ (trunk:66142M, Sep 2 2008, 17:09:46)
[GCC
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Well, should I backport this to release25-maint branch?
(If accepted, issue3719 as well)
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3748
___
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Using subprocess is only possible conditionally, ie. if available.
Please note that the module is intended to be usable with multiple
Python versions and must at least support Python 2.1.
We could consider an updated patch for 2.7 and 3.1,
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Updated the Python versions.
--
versions: +Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0 -Python 2.4
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3719
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
2.6 fixed in r66144, merged to 3.0 in r66147
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3747
___
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Well, if python was installed into directory named
foo ELF boo, python will say wrong architecture.
import platform
platform.architecture()
('32bit', 'ELF')
Is it not good to use file -b option?
___
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On 2008-09-02 12:55, Hirokazu Yamamoto wrote:
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Well, if python was installed into directory named
foo ELF boo, python will say wrong architecture.
import platform
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Checked in as r66145 and r66146.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3719
___
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
OK, I understand. And I must apologizes about previous
my patch.
fileout = _architecture_split(output)[1:]
should not be deleted. It was should be changed to
fileout = _architecture_split(output)
Thank you.
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
See the long discussion in issue3561.
--
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
superseder: - Windows installer should add Python and Scripts directories to
the PATH environment variable
New submission from Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tp_traverse and tp_clear on threading.local are defined, but the
Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC flag is not set. As a result, cycles are not collected:
import threading, weakref
o = threading.local()
class X(object): pass
...
x = X()
x.o = o
o.x
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
The patch is basically fine with me. While reviewing it I've found out
that threading.local doesn't have cyclic garbage collecting enabled.
I've opened a new issue for it in #3757.
--
nosy: +pitrou
Marc-Andre Lemburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Raising priority since this needs to be resolved prior to the final
release of Python 2.6/3.0.
Regarding finding the eula.txt in the VS2008 installation, there doesn't
appear to be a generic way. The eula.txt is stored in a folder named
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
With the patch, subclasses of threading.local seem to have an empty
__dict__:
import threading
class MyLocal(threading.local):
pass
l = MyLocal()
l.x = 2
l.__dict__ # returns {}
Maybe __dict__ should be special-cased in
Christian Heimes [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
Maybe __dict__ should be special-cased in local_getattro()?
With the patch it's also no longer possible to get a list of attribute
names. +1 for special casing __dict__ in getattro and setattro.
setattr(local,
New submission from Ralph Corderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A new target, check, has been added to Makefile for 2.6. It runs some
tests on the source code that are intended to check there's nothing
wrong before preparing a patch.
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Not so much too complicated as potentially touches a lot of code and
not something I want to fiddle with this close to release.
As I noted on python-dev, it's actually a change that can easily be
handled through the normal API deprecation
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Brett, how about patchcheck?
--
assignee: - brett.cannon
nosy: +benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3758
Jim Kleckner [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Here is the equals sign fix as a separate patch file.
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11343/equalsInEnv.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2975
Jim Kleckner [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Any hope for these two patches being applied?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2975
___
___
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Looks like we'll be living with the slowdown for 3.0, so marking this as
a high priority item for 3.1.
(Given that the API doesn't change, I wonder if this could be included
in a 3.0.1 release?)
--
priority: - high
versions: +Python
New submission from Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
asyncore.file_wrapper() dups passed handle, so original handle must be
closed.
--
components: Tests
files: test_asyncore.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 72343
nosy: ocean-city
severity: normal
status: open
title: test_asyncore.py
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This issue was missing a priority setting.
Alexander's range-sequence patch still applies cleanly to the Py3k
branch, and make test still runs correctly after applying it.
As Alexander notes above, range_contains does still need slightly better
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
It looks like your range_subscript() forgets to compute the length field...
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2690
___
Changes by Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file:
http://bugs.python.org/file11345/issue2690-range-sequence-ncoghlan.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2690
___
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
My initial patch had a few problems - I removed it and uploaded a
corrected version.
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file11346/issue2690-range-sequence-ncoghlan.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jfdp [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
To respond to a couple questions:
Adding the double quotes fixed the issue I had -- but I did very
limited testing.
The -b option is not support by 'file' on Solaris.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Good catch Antoine (I missed that in Alexander's patch) - working on
that now.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2690
___
Armin Rigo [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Maybe the file 'next-nevernull.patch' is not complete? I don't see any
change in the definition of PyIter_Check().
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3720
Facundo Batista [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Can not get into this now, but I'll be able to deal with this in some
weeks...
--
assignee: - facundobatista
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2486
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Oops, sorry. I have too many files opened at the same time.
Here is an updated patch.
I removed all the assert(PyIter_Check(it)), our evil iterator used to
make them fail anyway in debug mode; and in the case of a null function
pointer,
Changes by Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11317/next-nevernull.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3720
___
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
v2 of my updated patch attached to fix the issue Antoine noted.
Also gets rid of some tab-instead-of-spaces indenting issues in the
file, and avoids hardcoding PyRange_Type when creating new instances.
However, the patch still has issues, as
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +jcea
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3081
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
By the way, why is this release blocker? do we have performance numbers?
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2690
___
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I wonder if we shouldn't hold off on this. It's a substantial amount of
new code. I'd be fine with it going into 3.0.1 since it's pure
optimization (IIUC!). But right now we want burn-in, not new features.
Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Given the problems with it, I'm dropping this to normal priority and
punting to 3.1.
(the release blocker status was just temporary to ensure we got a
decision on it before rc1 - it previously didn't have a priority set)
--
keywords:
Changes by Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
keywords: +needs review
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3660
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Iain MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Knowing that the large read provokes the problem enables one to write
this simple workaround by subclassing IMAP4 without patching the library:
maxRead = 100
class MySSL (imaplib.IMAP4_SSL):
def read (self, n):
#print ..Attempting to
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Looks like Mark's patch was submitted as part of r66115 by Ben
accidentally (as part of reverting r66114). I can confirm this patch
resolves the incref issue as-is. I've run test_multiprocessing in a loop
for about an hour now with no
Brett Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Benjamin Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Brett, how about patchcheck?
Maybe. I will see if any inspiration comes to me in the near future.
Obviously
Hagen Fürstenau [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
There seems to be a pronouncement now
(http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2008-September/014692.html),
so I'm attaching a patch which clips to sys.maxsize and includes
Amaury's suggestions.
Added file:
Changes by Hagen Fürstenau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11307/len_check.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3729
___
Changes by Hagen Fürstenau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11308/len_check2.diff
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3729
___
Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
r66161 on py3k merges forward the fix for this
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3419
___
___
New submission from Paul Pogonyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PEP 3121 at python.org mentions PyType_Copy(). However, it doesn't seem
to be present in SVN version and there is no apparent replacement.
Please clarify how types should be created for different module
instances --- if just sharing is
Senthil [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Yes Janssen, I checked again and found it implemented in both trunk
(py26) and py3k. All the tests pass as well.
However, in one of my testcases for issue1424152, where I expected the
timeout to happen for do_handshake(), it did not take effect. I
Changes by Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
keywords: +easy, needs review
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3759
___
___
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Tested on Linux: each call to test.test_asyncore.test_main() opens two
file descriptors (shown in /proc/pid/fd). The patch corrects this.
--
keywords: -needs review
nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc
resolution: - accepted
Hirokazu Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks, fixed in r66162(trunk), r66163(py3k)
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3759
___
New submission from Chris Leow [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, fairly new to Python, so not sure if this is something you want as a
behaviour or not:
urllib.response object when fetching an HTTP1.1 page does not
transparently handle Transfer-Encoding: chunked, and I think it should.
You can view source
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
assignee: - loewis
nosy: +loewis
priority: - high
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3760
___
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11350/after_gps_review.patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3637
___
Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Well, this would be nice, but it doesn't seem serious enough to block
the release.
--
priority: release blocker - critical
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3444
Matt Chisholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Any progress on this? This patch is extremely straightforward (only
three lines of code), and should not break existing code.
The HttpOnly extension to cookies is now supported by IE, Firefox 3.0,
and Opera.
This article explains why
Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Well, I'm sorry but this a feature request and must be delayed for
2.7/3.1, since 2.6/3.0 are now in the release candidate phase. :-(
(as for the patch, it would be nice if it added an unit test for the new
feature)
--
nosy: +pitrou
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Applied both patches (a bit differently for the equal sign) as r66171.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2975
Changes by Antoine Pitrou [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3697
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Andrew McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Will do, although I'm slightly concerned that my bytes version of the
function is about 50% slower than the str version. I can see why, I
just can't think of a way to do it any faster. There's an inherent
asymetry in bytes type that didn't
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Gregory P. Smith reviewed the change on Rietveld, and the patch was
applied in r66173.
--
resolution: - accepted
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Dial [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This patch shouldn't have been applied as it is. The definition of
removeDuplicates is both poorly-named, not exactly correct, and
redundant (as there is already a normalize_and_reduce_paths) for
performing this fix on PATH.
Jim, you acknowledged
Changes by Andrew McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11352/re_escape-patch
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue3756
___
Jim Kleckner [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Yes, much better. I should have read into the interior of the
discussion rather than just the edges...
Thanks!
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2975
72 matches
Mail list logo
