Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
I reviewed the patch:
+_hexdig = '0123456789ABCDEFabcdef'
+_hextochr = dict((a+b, chr(int(a+b,16))) for a in _hexdig for b in _hexdig)
is really a neat way to generate the dict of mixed-case percent escape to use
with to unquote. I shall
New submission from Laszlo Nagy nagy...@gmail.com:
Clarify what isolation_level does, and how to use it, and why connections do
not commit/rollback in some cases.
Details here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2010-March/1239374.html
I'll paste code for ctx_manager_2.py here.
Changes by Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com:
--
assignee: - eric.smith
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6081
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Matt Giuca matt.gi...@gmail.com added the comment:
Thanks very much. Importantly, note that unquote is currently duplicated
between urllib and urlparse. I have a bug on it (#8143) but in the meantime,
you will have to commit this fix to both modules.
--
Palluat de Besset marc.palluatdebes...@sophos.com added the comment:
Yes, sorry for the confusion. I'm trying to build a universal 32 bit version of
Python that will be embedded in our software. we need it to run on 10.4 to 10.6
Mac systems, and would like to build it on a 10.6 machine. I've
Changes by Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org:
--
priority: release blocker - critical
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8141
___
___
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
As per msg100765, Ned confirms this is fixed for 2.6.5.
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8089
___
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
One issue to consider is pre/post-install actions. bdist_wininst loads
pythonxy.dll from the target system, which would fail if it is a 32-bit
installer process that tries to load a 64-bit python DLL.
--
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:
Re-opening for 3.1.2: the corresponding fixes have not made it into 3.1.2 yet.
--
status: closed - open
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8089
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
versions: +Python 3.1 -Python 2.6
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8089
___
___
New submission from anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
http://www.python.org/download/windows/
This page lacks information about which versions of Python were last supported
for Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows 2000. Which may run even though they are
not supported on these platforms
New submission from anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
http://docs.python.org/library/os.html#os.system
...This is implemented by calling the Standard C function system(), and has the
same limitations...
Which limitations?
BTW, is the Windows 98 comment can be dropped.
--
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
I can't reproduce this. If I run the file with msiexec, then select install
just for me, it will copy msvcr90.dll just fine.
--
nosy: +loewis
resolution: - works for me
status: open - closed
___
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment:
checked in after testing on {arm,i486,x86_64,powerpc,sparc,ia64}-linux with no
test failures.
fixed in r78974 on the trunk
fixed in r78975 on the py3k branch
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Please don't report multiple issues in a single bug report; when people follow
up claiming they saw this, it's then not clear what exactly they saw.
I have now fixed problem 1 in r78976, and put an installer incorporating that
change on
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Can you provide a patch?
--
nosy: +loewis
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3621
___
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Closing because of lack of response
--
resolution: - works for me
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4982
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment:
updated on the trunk and the py3k branch
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8142
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
Greg, is this issue still pending?. Can we close it?.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2960
___
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
That would depend on the implementation of the system() call on your platform.
There are already two notes for Unix and Windows right below that paragraph.
Going further into lower level specifics of the system() call is outside the
scope of that
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
I found the very same bug recently, and solve it in pybsddb 4.8.3. My patch is
exactly like this :).
The problem will be solved in 2.7 when I integrate pybsddb 4.8.3/4.8.4. Not
sure about 2.6, though. Will try.
changeset: 478:a35a9082ee26
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment:
fixed for 2.7, 3.1, 3.2, will fix for 2.6 after the 2.6.5 release.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7356
___
New submission from Benjamin VENELLE kai...@gmail.com:
Hi,
In SyslogHandler class from logging package, emit() function calls
socket.sendto() at line 785. Passing arguments are not in the right order due
to flags parameter which is optional (@see
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
You'll want to look at
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWebsiteCreatingNewTickets
Win 2000 is currently supported, although there have been rumblings of
beginning to drop that support.
The info exists in PEP-11 for now, but I agree that a
Changes by Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org:
--
nosy: +vinay.sajip
priority: - normal
stage: - test needed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8148
___
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
Patch up-ported to pybsddb 4.8.4.
--
nosy: +jcea
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5073
___
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
Patch up-ported to pybsddb 4.8.4.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7808
___
___
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
It is just a matter of running makeunicodedata affter changing 5.1 - 5.2.
It generates the 3 db files:
* Modules/unicodedata_db.h
* Modules/unicodename_db.h
* Objects/unicodetype_db.h
Then you adjust the expectedchecksum in
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
I just did the minimal change. I don't know if removing defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV)
is safe.
HAVE_DEVICE_MACROS is defined if configure finds makedev() macro.
Clarify your comment about configure.in changes being wrong.
--
nosy: -barry,
David Beazley d...@dabeaz.com added the comment:
Here's a short benchmark for everyone who thinks that my original benchmark was
somehow related to TCP behavior. This one doesn't even involve sockets:
from threading import Thread
import time
def writenums(f,n):
start = time.time()
Changes by franck fluxs...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +fluxspir
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8139
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
+1 on this functionality being added for 2.7 and 3.2. You also mentioned in
pvt email that it would be better to patch compileall.py than py_compile.py to
take advantage of the quiet and force options (which seems good to me).
I have a few
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
On some platforms the difference is not so important.
I ran it in Debian Lenny AMD64 Core2 Duo P9600 @2.66GHz.
# Python 3.2a0 (py3k:78982M, Mar 15 2010, 15:40:42)
# [GCC 4.3.4] on linux2
0.67s without thread
0.84s with spinning
Changes by Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk:
--
assignee: - vinay.sajip
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8148
___
___
Tom Loredo lor...@astro.cornell.edu added the comment:
Ned-
I *did* run make install; everything I reported was about the situation
*after* running make install. In particular, I don't know any way to get
access to IDLE without make install; what I described came from using the
version in
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
With line buffering, I see the issue.
* 6 s without thread
* 115 s with the spinning thread (varying: 60 s, 98 s)
* 16 s with the spinning thread and the last gilinter.patch
# Modified version of the test case, with bufsize=1
Changes by Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com:
--
nosy: +dmalcolm
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8140
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Florent Xicluna wrote:
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
It is just a matter of running makeunicodedata affter changing 5.1 -
5.2.
It generates the 3 db files:
* Modules/unicodedata_db.h
*
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment:
changed the @ syntax to an option -i, and added a test for
compile_file/compile_dir.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16556/compileall.py.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Gustavo Narea gustavona...@2degreesnetwork.com:
Download Python 2.5.5 and run ./configure: _ctypes.so won't be compiled
because the ./configure file for libffi in ctypes is not executable.
Here's the output:
env: Python-2.5.5/Modules/_ctypes/libffi/configure:
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
So the Unicode database format itself has not changed ?
No. The changes listed below have no impact afai-have-tested.
- - - - - - -
F. Unicode Character Database Changes
The
David Beazley d...@dabeaz.com added the comment:
Whoa, that's pretty diabolically evil with bufsize=1. On my machine, doing
that just absolutely kills the performance (13 seconds without the spinning
thread versus 557 seconds with the thread!). Or, put another way, the writing
performance
Marc-Andre Lemburg m...@egenix.com added the comment:
Florent Xicluna wrote:
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
So the Unicode database format itself has not changed ?
No. The changes listed below have no impact afai-have-tested.
Ok, so +1 for updating to 5.2.
David Beazley d...@dabeaz.com added the comment:
Almost forgot--if I turn off one of the CPU cores, the time drops from 557
seconds to 32 seconds. Gotta love it!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7946
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:
Python 2.5 will no longer receive bug fixes (unless they are security-related).
Closing this as won't fix.
--
nosy: +loewis
resolution: - wont fix
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com:
--
title: upgrade to Unicode 5.2? - upgrade to Unicode 5.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8024
___
Barry A. Warsaw ba...@python.org added the comment:
Looks good to me, and should help distros, so +1.
--
assignee: - doko
resolution: - accepted
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8140
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
Done with r78986.
--
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7787
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
Done with r78986.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7783
___
___
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com:
--
priority: - normal
resolution: - fixed
stage: patch review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7783
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file15842/issue767645_test_pep277.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue767645
___
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
With r78594, test_pep277 is active on all platforms having Unicode-friendly
filesystem encoding.
--
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from aalex andrewa...@gmail.com:
urllib.request can not support many standard HTTP 1.1 METHODS including HEAD,
PUT, DELETE.
Adding this would be trivial (either as a special header METHOD) or its own
paramater, creating additional use, with little or no drawback.
--
Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com added the comment:
I noticed some failures on Sparc Solaris10 buildbots (both trunk and 3.x)
==
FAIL: test_ulonglong (ctypes.test.test_callbacks.Callbacks)
Changes by Nir Aides n...@winpdb.org:
--
nosy: +nirai
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7946
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Roumen Petrov bugtr...@roumenpetrov.info added the comment:
Jesús Cea Avión wrote:
Jesús Cea Aviónj...@jcea.es added the comment:
I just did the minimal change. I don't know if removing
defined(HAVE_MAKEDEV) is safe.
The python build system is full with minimal changes and result is a
New submission from anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
http://codereview.appspot.com/577041/show
Index: make.bat
===
--- make.bat(revision 78986)
+++ make.bat(working copy)
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-@@echo off
+...@echo off
Changes by Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16156/issue7347.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7347
___
Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org added the comment:
Fixed a few a/an word changes and a few tab/space issues. Re-uploaded to
Rietveld at http://codereview.appspot.com/580041
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16558/issue7347.diff
___
Python
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
Checking the pybsddb 4.8.4devel with current trunk I still see this:
Berkeley DB 4.8.26: (December 18, 2009)
bsddb.db.version(): (4, 8, 26)
bsddb.db.__version__: 4.8.4devel1
bsddb.db.cvsid: $Id: _bsddb.c,v 6408a812f035 2010/03/15 19:15:06
Changes by Thijs Triemstra li...@collab.nl:
--
nosy: +thijs
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6142
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk added the comment:
This appears to be a duplicate of #5421.
--
resolution: - duplicate
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8148
New submission from Francois duf.franc...@gmail.com:
On a freshly installed Python 2.6.4, the division / truncates the result to the
lower integer as // should.
This occurs on both the current 32 and 64 bits builds.
This is shown in the attached picture.
--
components: Interpreter
Changes by Francois duf.franc...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file16559/python_interpreter.png
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8152
___
Changes by Francois duf.franc...@gmail.com:
--
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8152
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
One thing to think about with
this example is the proper priority of I/O handling generally. What
if, instead of a file, this example code was writing on a pipe to
another process? For that, you would probably want that I/O thread
to be
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:
Oh the situation definitely matters. Although, in the big picture,
most programmers would probably prefer to have fast I/O performance
over slow I/O performance :-).
Yes, of course. But that's not the point. We could try to improve GIL
Matthias Klose d...@debian.org added the comment:
fixed for 2.7 and 3.2
--
resolution: accepted - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8140
___
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment:
So David's right that local commits are bad from a threading perspective. If
you happen to have an import trigger a thread which itself triggers an import
you will lock up the interpreter. Typically this is avoided by not importing
anything in
David Beazley d...@dabeaz.com added the comment:
Oh the situation definitely matters. Although, in the big picture, most
programmers would probably prefer to have fast I/O performance over slow I/O
performance :-).
--
___
Python tracker
David Beazley d...@dabeaz.com added the comment:
I absolutely agree 100% that it is not worth trying to fix the GIL for every
conceivable situation (although if you could, I wouldn't complain).
To me, there are really only two scenarios worth worrying about:
1. Get rid of all of that
Matt Giuca matt.gi...@gmail.com added the comment:
What about the alternative (newmodule) patch? That doesn't have threading
issues, or break backwards compatibility.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8143
Sridhar Ratnakumar sridh...@activestate.com added the comment:
BTW, 3.1.2rc1 does not contain this fix, but contains issue6163.
Any reason why this fix is missing in 3.1.2rc1?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
I am about to integrate pybsddb 4.8.4, that compiles against BDB 4.8.
Oracle is going to publish a new Berkeley DB lib in a month or less. I have the
pybsddb release ready, too.
--
___
Python tracker
Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment:
Doko, bsddb3 is suppose to be out of py3k.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue6949
___
Brett Cannon br...@python.org added the comment:
You could break it out into a module, but that feels like overkill for some
minor code duplication that is not going to be a problem once we stop caring
about Python 2.x. I personally wouldn't bother going that far.
--
priority: normal
pds pirdir...@gmail.com added the comment:
To loewis:
I'm sorry for submitting multiple issues in a single bug report.
Also, currently, I'm afraid I don't have a testing environment for your MSI
build.
To other members who might follow this issue:
Please specify problem numbers when
77 matches
Mail list logo
