STINNER Victor added the comment:
The patch adds a a lot of new warnings. Would it be possible to fix them before
applying the patch?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22110
STINNER Victor added the comment:
My patch for the issue #22043 adds nanosecond precision to get the system clock.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15443
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 6b7f189daa62 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '2.7':
Issue #22068: Don't create self reference cycles in idlelib.ConfigDialog.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6b7f189daa62
New changeset 1927f47a1838 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '3.4':
Issue #22068:
Ned Deily added the comment:
The checkin seems to have broken test_idle and test_ttk_guionly. Typical
failure:
==
ERROR: test_horizontal_range
(tkinter.test.test_ttk.test_extensions.LabeledScaleTest)
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
-R no longer finds leaks with current Idle tests. There might still be some in
modules not tested.
--
components: -IDLE, Tests
title: test_idle leaks uncollectable objects - tkinter: avoid reference loops
with Variables and Fonts
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18597
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
title: precise time.time() under Windows 8 - precise time.time() under Windows
8: use GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19007
Jonas Jelten added the comment:
I'd say Python should definitely change its internal string type to char*.
Exposing handy wchar_t-char conversion functions don't resolve the data
represenation enhancement.
--
___
Python tracker
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Status of CLOCK_MONOTONIC in Hurd:
https://github.com/ArneBab/hurd-web/blob/master/open_issues/clock_gettime.mdwn
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22043
Changes by Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopol...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +belopolsky
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22043
___
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +neologix
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22043
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Enabling the warnings may be a good incitation for other people to fix them ;)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22110
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +loewis, steve.dower
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17371
___
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ezio.melotti
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22110
___
___
New submission from Milan Oberkirch:
The status quo of test_imaplib is a bit frustrating: 4 test functions out of 31
get executed by default while only few seem to need any resources.
I tried to solve this in the attached patch. Did I get something wrong or was
that checking for network
Changes by Milan Oberkirch milan...@oberkirch.org:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file36170/imaplib_test.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22111
___
Changes by Milan Oberkirch milan...@oberkirch.org:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36171/imaplib_test.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22111
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I reopen the issue because the documentation is not correct. Using the proactor
event loop, the socket doesn't need to be non-blocking. Should we mention it?
Another issue: BaseEventLoop.connect_read_pipe() doc says that the pipe is set
to non-blocking mode,
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +steve.dower
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18402
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:
--
resolution: - not a bug
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22089
___
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
Thank you for the patch. I've posted some review comments. Two further remarks:
- this makes the ProcessPool API slightly different from the ThreadPool one. I
wonder if this is acceptable or not. Thoughts?
- the patch would need unit tests for the additional
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Two small fixes from Zach (thanks again Zach!) and I updated against current
trunk so it should apply cleanly. How's it look now?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36172/larry.clinicize.posixmodule.6.diff
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
I don't think this is needed nor do I think that it is a good idea to have a
copy() method in the ABCs because they know so little about their concrete
underlying class (perhaps the backing store in the filesystem or a database).
Besides, a user already
Dan O'Reilly added the comment:
re: Diverging ThreadPoolExecutor and ProcessPoolExecutor APIs. I thought about
this as well. It would of course be possible to make ThreadPoolExecutor's API
match, but it would serve no useful purpose that I can think of. I guess we
could make the
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Agreed with Raymond. The return type of copy() for ABCs feels problematic.
MutableMapping doesn't have it either.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22101
New submission from Daniel Greenfeld:
Problem
The documentation on asyncio provides an example of a parallel execution of
tasks. The code is at:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-task.html#example-parallel-execution-of-tasks
``` python
import asyncio
@asyncio.coroutine
def
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Hm. I think there are two different situations.
One is where the app creates a socket (or other I/O thingie), passes it off to
asyncio, and then asyncio owns it. This is the case for pipes and also for the
optional sock parameter for create_connection().
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Thanks for reporting a doc bug!
The code should use asyncio.async() instead of loop.create_task().
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22112
Daniel Greenfeld added the comment:
This has been fixed in 3.4.2, but shows up in the 3.4.1 documentation.
How do I fix the 3.4.1 documentation so this doesn't show up?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36173/Screen Shot 2014-07-30 at 8.13.12
PM.png
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
I honestly don't know; ask Benjamin. :-)
Personally, I'd say that ship has sailed.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22112
___
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 9f333c06915f by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default':
Back out of changes to Tkinter variables trace commands (issue #22085).
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9f333c06915f
--
___
Python tracker
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 818989a48e96 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7':
Issue #21580: Now Tkinter correctly handles binary data and maskdata
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/818989a48e96
--
___
Python tracker
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
