[issue43283] IDLE: Explain print slowness and speedup method

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +23387 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24608 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43283] IDLE: Explain print slowness and speedup method

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +23386 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24607 ___ Python tracker

[issue43283] IDLE: Explain print slowness and speedup method

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset 4cf7bb8e22bf37e6d65bf4cb5618d09c4a8ad612 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch 'master': bpo-43283: Rearrange some IDLE doc paragraphs. (GH-24604) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/4cf7bb8e22bf37e6d65bf4cb5618d09c4a8ad612 --

[issue43278] unnecessary leading '\n' from Py_GetCompiler() when build with different complier

Change by Joseph Shen : -- title: Inconsistent behavior of Py_GetCompiler() -> unnecessary leading '\n' from Py_GetCompiler() when build with different complier ___ Python tracker

[issue43278] Inconsistent behavior of Py_GetCompiler()

Change by Joseph Shen : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +23384 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24606 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43269] [sqlite3] Clean up function scoping

Change by Erlend Egeberg Aasland : -- pull_requests: +23383 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24605 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43269] [sqlite3] Clean up function scoping

Erlend Egeberg Aasland added the comment: Serhiy also mentioned that marking functions definitions with the extern keyword is not very common in the CPython source base. https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24578#discussion_r579506678 I suggest cleaning up those as well, while we're at

[issue43283] IDLE: Explain print slowness and speedup method

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +23382 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24604 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43283] IDLE: Explain print slowness and speedup method

New submission from Terry J. Reedy : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66286367/why-is-my-function-faster-than-pythons-print-function-in-idle had some tests of printing speed that showed that print in IDLE can be much slower than in REPL. I did further tests that showed than combining

[issue43283] IDLE: Explain print slowness and speedup method

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, IDLE nosy: docs@python, terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal stage: patch review status: open title: IDLE: Explain print slowness and speedup method type: enhancement versions: Python 3.10, Python

[issue27646] doc: yield from expression can be any iterable

Change by Terry J. Reedy : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.8, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue27640] Add --disable-test-modules configure option to not build nor install tests

Eli Schwartz added the comment: I filed issue43282 for this. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue43282] Add split install targets to install tests separately from lib

New submission from Eli Schwartz : cf. https://bugs.python.org/issue27640#msg386758 Carrying on from the addition of --disable-test-modules, I would find it convenient to be able to still provide the tests, but install them separately. The end result would be two distro packages, one slim

[issue27646] doc: yield from expression can be any iterable

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 7cc58890b3c16c28360a9abe030258426e89fec1 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-27646: Say that 'yield from' expression can be any iterable (GH-24595) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7cc58890b3c16c28360a9abe030258426e89fec1

[issue43166] Unused letters in Windows-specific pragma optimize

Change by David Bolen : -- nosy: +db3l ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue27646] doc: yield from expression can be any iterable

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 089a21f7429a3fd3cf78e3779df724757d346d19 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.8': bpo-27646: Say that 'yield from' expression can be any iterable (GH-24595) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/089a21f7429a3fd3cf78e3779df724757d346d19

[issue27646] doc: yield from expression can be any iterable

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 2.0 -> 3.0 pull_requests: +23380 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24602 ___ Python tracker

[issue27646] doc: yield from expression can be any iterable

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +23381 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24603 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue27646] doc: yield from expression can be any iterable

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: New changeset 2f9ef514fb24b6a95bd3272885f197752810c107 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch 'master': bpo-27646: Say that 'yield from' expression can be any iterable (GH-24595) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/2f9ef514fb24b6a95bd3272885f197752810c107

[issue43280] additional argument for str.join()

Change by Steven D'Aprano : -- resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue43280] additional argument for str.join()

Steven D'Aprano added the comment: Looking more closely, I think that the semantics are to concatenate the extra argument to the second-last item: ", ".join(["a", "b", "c"]) # -> "a, b, c" ", ".join(["a", "b", "c"], ", and") # -> "a, b, and, c" which would be the same as:

[issue43281] Walrus comprehension rebind checking behavior

New submission from Saiyang Gou : # test PEP 572 disallows walrus use cases such as `[(i := 1) for i in [1]]`, because `for i` implies that `i` is local to the comprehension but `(i := 1)` implies that `i` is "exported", which is a contradiction. However, I noticed the following behavior

[issue43269] [sqlite3] Clean up function scoping

Berker Peksag added the comment: New changeset bf838a6e7eec2063a17c7c33dfa94afeef116f36 by Erlend Egeberg Aasland in branch 'master': bpo-43269: Clean up sqlite3 file scope (GH-24578) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bf838a6e7eec2063a17c7c33dfa94afeef116f36 --

[issue19073] Inability to specific __qualname__ as a property on a class instance.

Lewis Gaul added the comment: This would also be useful for me - I just hit this same problem. If someone could give some guidance on how to make this change I'd be happy to put up a PR. -- nosy: +LewisGaul ___ Python tracker

[issue43280] additional argument for str.join()

Steven D'Aprano added the comment: Python 3.9 is in feature freeze, this couldn't be added before 3.10 now. You have: ", ".join(["a", "b", "c"], ", and ") outputing this: "a, b, and, c" So what are the semantics of this additional argument? To insert it before the last item?

[issue42643] http.server does not support HTTP range requests

David Bordeynik added the comment: I would appreciate a code review - thank you -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue43251] [sqlite3] sqlite3_column_name() failures should raise MemoryError

Erlend Egeberg Aasland added the comment: "SELECT 1" yields "1" as column name. "SELECT <...> AS N" yields "N" as column name. "SELECT NULL" yields "NULL" as column name. We can't set the column name via the API, so that's pretty much it (implicit name or explicit through the AS keyword). As

[issue43280] additional argument for str.join()

Dennis Sweeney added the comment: This seems like a very specific use case. Too specific IMO for a method on all string objects for anyone using Python anywhere in the world. Why not just write a function like this? def my_join(strings, sep=", ", last_sep=", and "): strings =

[issue43280] additional argument for str.join()

Change by Fabian Brinkmann : -- title: addition argument for str.join() -> additional argument for str.join() ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43280] addition argument for str.join()

New submission from Fabian Brinkmann : It would be nice to have an additional argument for str.join() so this ", ".join(["a", "b", "c"], ", and ") would output "a, b, and, c" -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 387426 nosy: f-brinkmann priority: normal severity: normal status:

[issue41837] Upgrade installers to OpenSSL 1.1.1j

Ned Deily added the comment: 1.1.1j was issued earlier this week and, from browsing the source, it appears that this fix is included (it's not mentioned as a major issue) along with other fixes. So I assume we just need to update the installers to use 1.1.1j. The question is then do need to

[issue43279] Update code taken from Keccak Code Package

Christian Heimes added the comment: Please hold off. Once PEP 644 gets accepted, I'm going to remove our copy of Keccak and _sha3 module entirely. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue42981] Error messages raised by _hashlib_scrypt_impl() are slightly misleading

Change by Illia Volochii : -- resolution: -> wont fix stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43277] Add PySet_CheckExact

Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43279] Update code taken from Keccak Code Package

Change by Illia Volochii : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +23379 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24601 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue34013] Inconsistent SyntaxError for print

Change by Lysandros Nikolaou : -- nosy: +lys.nikolaou ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue43277] Add PySet_CheckExact

Pablo Galindo Salgado added the comment: New changeset d439fb304ca3098aab1ed0a314996f9d29347b21 by Pablo Galindo in branch 'master': bpo-43277: Add PySet_CheckExact to the C-API (GH-24598) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d439fb304ca3098aab1ed0a314996f9d29347b21 --

[issue43279] Update code taken from Keccak Code Package

New submission from Illia Volochii : There were some updates to the Keccak package (https://github.com/XKCP/XKCP) since it was integrated in CPython initially. I will submit a pull request soon -- components: Extension Modules messages: 387422 nosy: christian.heimes, illia-v

[issue43265] [sqlite3] Improve backup error handling

Change by Berker Peksag : Removed file: https://bugs.python.org/file49823/DOC-20200420-WA ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue43265] [sqlite3] Improve backup error handling

Berker Peksag added the comment: > 3.9, I presume? Yes, I was going too fast :) -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue43276] add `false` and `true` keywords (aliases) for True and False

parsa mpsh added the comment: I sent a PR: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24600 -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue43265] [sqlite3] Improve backup error handling

Erlend Egeberg Aasland added the comment: Regarding 1: After thinking about it, I see nothing wrong with raising ValueError error. No need to change current behaviour. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue43265] [sqlite3] Improve backup error handling

Erlend Egeberg Aasland added the comment: 3.9, I presume? Yeah, I guess so. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue43276] add `false` and `true` keywords (aliases) for True and False

Change by parsa mpsh : -- pull_requests: +23378 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24600 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43278] Inconsistent behavior of Py_GetCompiler()

New submission from Joseph Shen : The function Py_GetCompiler() return the version info with a leading '\n' when build with GCC/clang, while without this on other compilers. This inconsistent make the REPL print the 'welcome message' quit different, which I think is not we expect. >From the

[issue43265] [sqlite3] Improve backup error handling

Berker Peksag added the comment: I'd even consider a cryptic error message a minor usability bug and backport it to at least 3.10. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43276] add `false` and `true` keywords (aliases) for True and False

parsa mpsh added the comment: Also adding them as builtin keywords will make it easier than setting them as variables. in this method, we should define them everywhere, but in builtin type its easy. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue43277] Add PySet_CheckExact

Change by Pablo Galindo Salgado : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +23376 stage: -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24598 ___ Python tracker

[issue43276] add `false` and `true` keywords (aliases) for True and False

parsa mpsh added the comment: Yes i know this. but why not adding this builtin? this will be very nice! -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43277] Add PySet_CheckExact

New submission from Pablo Galindo Salgado : For some mysterious reason we have PySet_Check, PyFrozenSet_Check, PyAnySet_Check, PyAnySet_CheckExact and PyFrozenSet_CheckExact but no PySet_CheckExact -- components: C API messages: 387413 nosy: pablogsal priority: normal severity:

[issue43276] add `false` and `true` keywords (aliases) for True and False

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: You can do it yourself in your script. It is just two lines of code: true = True false = False And it works in all Python versions! -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka resolution: -> rejected stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed

[issue43276] add `false` and `true` keywords (aliases) for True and False

New submission from parsa mpsh : I wanna add `true` and `false` aliases for `True` and `False` keywords. Currently my patch is ready and i will send it as a pull request. -- messages: 387411 nosy: parsampsh priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: add `false` and `true`

[issue42128] Structural Pattern Matching (PEP 634)

Daniel Moisset added the comment: Note: I will NOT write something for "What's New in 3.10" seeing that's in progress -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue42128] Structural Pattern Matching (PEP 634)

Daniel Moisset added the comment: Fyi, I'm looking into the documentation. I think I can have something basic for the middle of this week, so it should be ok for March 1st. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue42990] Improve the C code for calling Python code: _PyEval_EvalCode()

STINNER Victor added the comment: New changeset 46496f9d12582bf11f4911ad0f23315d6f277907 by Victor Stinner in branch 'master': bpo-42990: Functions inherit current builtins (GH-24564) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/46496f9d12582bf11f4911ad0f23315d6f277907 --

[issue43275] [venv] Add a `.gitignore` file with content `*` in the root folder generated by venv module

star2000 added the comment: I still think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. -- components: +Library (Lib) resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed title: Add a `.gitignore` file with content `*` in the root folder generated by venv module ->

[issue43275] Add a `.gitignore` file with content `*` in the root folder generated by venv module

Karthikeyan Singaravelan added the comment: This seems to be a duplicate of https://bugs.python.org/issue39236 -- nosy: +brett.cannon, vinay.sajip, xtreak ___ Python tracker

[issue43251] [sqlite3] sqlite3_column_name() failures should raise MemoryError

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Investigate where column names are initialized and whether is it possible to get them NULLs. The array of column names is filled with NULLs when initialized and later it is filled with references to strings. I am wondering whether there is a gap between

[issue43275] Add a `.gitignore` file with content `*` in the root folder generated by venv module

New submission from star2000 : In this way, you don't need to add `venv` to `.gitignore` at the root of each project. -- messages: 387404 nosy: star2000 priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Add a `.gitignore` file with content `*` in the root folder generated by venv

[issue43251] [sqlite3] sqlite3_column_name() failures should raise MemoryError

Erlend Egeberg Aasland added the comment: That's inside sqlite3_value_text() and friends, then? Let's investigate further before concluding. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue43251] [sqlite3] sqlite3_column_name() failures should raise MemoryError

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: It also returns NULL if the column name was not set (is it even possible?). -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue42990] Improve the C code for calling Python code: _PyEval_EvalCode()

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Regarding the text in What's New 3.10 about this at > https://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.10.html#other-language-changes, I > recommend adding there that func.__builtins__ is initialized from > globals["__builtins__"], if it exists, else from the

[issue37146] opcode cache for LOAD_GLOBAL emits false alarm in memory leak hunting

Change by Christian Heimes : -- components: +Interpreter Core -SSL nosy: -christian.heimes title: SSl Securité version 3.9.2 -> opcode cache for LOAD_GLOBAL emits false alarm in memory leak hunting type: security -> behavior ___ Python tracker

[issue37146] SSl Securité version 3.9.2

Webstar Website added the comment: dans cette version pour securité maximale SSLContext.wrap_socket() import socket import ssl hostname = 'www.python.org' context = ssl.create_default_context() with socket.create_connection((hostname, 443)) as sock: with context.wrap_socket(sock,

[issue43274] Backlinks Strong decouverte SSL

Christian Heimes added the comment: Could you please repost your question in English? I don't speak French and Google translate output is incomprehensible. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue43274] Backlinks Strong decouverte SSL

New submission from Webstar Website : Comment puis-je savoir si mon python généré à la source a activé SSL il faut obtenir l'information suivante : de savoir si opensslest est installé, vous pouvez analyser la sortie de openssl version: $ openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.2g-fips 1 Mar 2016 on

[issue43273] Mock `_mock_wraps` is undocumented and inconsistently named

New submission from Richard Wise : I am trying to use wraps to delegate a call to a decorated patch mock to another method. By examining the source code, I was able to achieve this using the (apparently undocumented) `Mock._mock_wraps` attribute instead of the `wraps` attribute which would

[issue43260] Never release buffer when MemoryError in print()

Change by Ramin Farajpour Cami : -- nosy: +vstinner ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: