Arve Knudsen added the comment:
I noticed this issue too, thanks for fixing it!
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21258>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by Arve Knudsen :
--
nosy: +Arve.Knudsen
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21258>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
Yes, I agree it doesn't make much sense for HEAD AFAICT, but Chrome does it.
Maybe there's a reason?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.o
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
Here's my initial proposal for a patch against httplib, based on the 2.7 branch
of cpython repository. I've included a couple of tests, which check that when
content is empty, content-length is set to 0 for certain methods (POST/PUT etc)
and not spe
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
Actually, when inspecting the HTTP requests sent by Chrome for the different
methods (a great little Chrome app called Postman let me fire requests
manually), I found that content-length would be set for most methods. I could
confirm that 'content-leng
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
Which HTTP methods should we auto-define content-length for? POST and PUT? I
noticed that my first attempt at a patch would define content-length also for
GET requests, which broke a unit test (test_ipv6host_header
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
I can look into patch and 3.x tonight I think. Should I provide a test with an
eventual patch?
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14
New submission from Arve Knudsen :
httplib doesn't specify the HTTP header 'content-length' for POST requests
without data. Conceptually this makes sense, considering the empty content.
However, IIS (7.5) servers don't accept such requests and respond with a 411
status cod
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
I'll keep it in mind.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:00 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
>
> R. David Murray added the comment:
>
> Yes, having a cmd.exe 'quote' function, parallel to the shutil 'quote'
> function, would be an exce
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
The non-obvious thing with 8972 is what to do with an argument list when the
'shell' option is True, isn't it? I can't see how it overlaps with my case.
My suggestion is a flag to enable argument protection in Popen, either just
for argume
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
I wasn't saying that subprocess is interpreting the arguments, but that the
shell is. Which was highly unexpected to me when outside of shell mode
(i.e., shell == False). From some further testing, though, I see that the
transformation from sequence to co
Arve Knudsen added the comment:
Would you mind defining why the 2.7 behaviour is correct in this particular
case? The list2cmdline behaviour discussed in issue 8972 has to do with
shell commandlines; in this case, in my eyes any shell invocation (in order
to run a .bat I guess) is only an
New submission from Arve Knudsen :
As a regression from Python 2.6, when running .bat scripts on Windows with
f.ex. subprocess.call under Python 2.7.1, arguments get interpreted by the
shell. This bit me in the way that I could no longer pass arguments containing
the character '|
13 matches
Mail list logo
