Benny Siegert added the comment:
Hmm, I thought I was making an argument _for_ applying the patch. As I see it,
these are benefits of merging the patch:
1. Being able to compile an unmodified upstream Python on MirBSD.
2. The patches in pkgsrc become smaller.
3. Future Python versions contain
Benny Siegert added the comment:
I agree that the patch is quite small. I am regularly building new Python
versions (using pkgsrc) so I can maintain the patch for future releases.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12
Changes by Benny Siegert :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file23153/patch-az
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue12976>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Benny Siegert added the comment:
As requested, here is the full patch for MirBSD support. The diff was taken
against version 2.7.2. It is really quite easy, you just need to handle MirBSD
like OpenBSD.
With this patch, I can successfully compile and run Python on MirBSD. Even
though it is
Benny Siegert added the comment:
There are actually only two things that need to be touched for supporting
MirBSD: This and the Configure script. I was planning to submit the Configure
patches separately, I just started with this patch as it is so trivial
New submission from Benny Siegert :
When building python-2.6 on MirBSD, building the select module (which uses the
kqueue backend on this platform) fails. This is because EVFILT_TIMER is not
available on the platform.
The proposed patch is for python-2.6 but should apply to tip too.
This was
