Can added the comment:
@sobolevn I was expecting the following test case to be covered.
self.assertRaises(self.failureException, self.assertCountEqual,
{'a': 1}, {'a': 2})
what I understand from the doc of the assertion is that elements have to
Change by Can :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +29261
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31077
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
Change by Can :
--
nosy: cansarigol
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: assertCountEqual doesn't work as expected for dictionary elements
type: behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Necdet Can Atesman :
--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +soulmerge
nosy_count: 3.0 -> 4.0
pull_requests: +21663
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/22692
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.p
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
Hello,
I had the requirement to make excessive use of named tuples in an extended way.
The applications are variable data sets with optional items. Typical in
protocol dat a units, or e.g. mixed abstract filesystem types for heterogeneous
file
Change by Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
--
title: query of global options delivers error messages even when successful ->
query of global metadata options delivers error messages even when successful
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
The 'setup.py' interface offers some global options, which could be queried.
For example among numerous others the 'classifiers'.
The current implementation displays for example for the following call::
python setup.py --des
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Current related issues are:
issue 38714
issue 38711
issue 38709
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Current related issues are:
issue 38714
issue 38711
issue 38709
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Current related issues are:
issue 38714
issue 38711
issue 38709
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38
Change by Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
--
type: -> behavior
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38714>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscrib
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
Even though this involves 'setuptools', I write this issue here because of the
tight coupling of 'distutils' and 'setuptools' e.g. by the passed 'self'
parameter.
The aliases as represented by the command
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
Even though this involves 'setuptools', I write this issue here because of the
tight coupling of 'distutils' and 'setuptools' e.g. by the passed 'self'
parameter.
The central API 'setup()' -
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
The command 'alias' rewrites the configuration file completely when a new alias
is added. The default file is 'setup.cfg'. All comments of the original file
are stripped off before, though the new 'setup.cfg' does n
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Fix two typos in my previous post:
#>>>
This basic diamond structure represents the call signatures:
I: for D
II: for B and C
III: for A
#<<<
and
#>>>
The current implementation changes the routed method c
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Hi,
first of all thank you both for the fast reply.
The point is here, that the call routing and the parameter passing are
intermixed. The MRO defines the call order, but does not define a signature
change for the call within one inheritance layer
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Hey,
first of all thank you for the fast reply.
Your examples reinforce exactly my issue. I prefer the KISS principle in
providing isolated use-cases for transparency without extras. Which is
seperated reduced flat calls only.
The other point is, I
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
The attached examples evaluate inheritance by mixins with different
arameters and in different orders.
The 'super()' call propagates the call resolution by definition
to the next level, and cares about multiple inheritance as well
as mix
Yigit Can added the comment:
Similar but not same.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue35669>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
In order to avoid further confusion (github: #1486):
> This is the wrong bug tracker for urllib3. The urllib3 package is not part of
> Python's standard library.
=> OK.
# As xtreak pointed out, it's not even a bug in urllib3 or
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
@christian.heimes , @xtreak
Thanks, just for documentation, hope this is the right place - putting one to
debian later:
See: issue - 1486: https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/issues/1486
for file:
https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/blob/master/src
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
@xtreak
I didn't checked the source of the assignment of the instance of *Retry* to
*self.total*. For me it was important to get the display of the actual source
of the failure, which is the failed access to PyPI. Thus my proposal, just to
inte
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
Hi,
I am using the installation script *adafruit-pitft.sh* which tries to apply
*urllib3* which itself tries to install nested dependencies,
here *evdev* from PyPI.
When the installation is offline - e.g. by internal mirror of debian/raspbian -
PyPI
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
See also
issue26741 - subprocess.Popen should emit a ResourceWarning in destructor if ...
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
The subprocess call *subprocess.Popen* in Python3.6 was added a number of
resource warnings, including subprocess run-state and open files. This is a
very good facility for debugging, but causes a lot of trouble for programs
relying on subprocesses
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
I am not sure whether this is already covered by an issue, it is present in
3.6.2 and 3.6.4.
The class Interpolation in the configparser module causes an exception:
File "/opt/python/python-3.6.4/lib/python3.6/configparser.py", lin
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
I got your point, missed it before, sorry.
So just for completeness.
My issue was basically about the ambiguity of the str()-constructor
and the str()-built-in-function. Therefore the len/type prints.
It works with parameters:
(3.6.2) [acue@lap001
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Sorry for the typo.
--
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file47276/howto_bytes_005typo.py
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue32
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Hello,
the following reduced example probably shows the issue a
little better.
I have currently not yet the 3.7+ environment, but guess
the same behavior.
Regards
Arno
--
versions: +Python 3.7, Python 3.8
Added file: https://bugs.python.org
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez :
Hello,
I am currently writing some dual-version libraries and have
to deal with str/unicode.
The attached code example contains the str/unicode handling.
The Python3.6.2 release behaves as I did not expected for
all of the following the conversions
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez:
See also 28391: Multiple occurances of: Closing quotes separate words
The issue 28391 is accepted, as it is defined:
Quotes *within* words are ignored, only a leading quoted string will result in
a separate word. (That's recursive: try '
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez:
I am currently writing an extended options scanner including
shlex-compatibility mode. So including numerous extended unittests for
compatibility verification.
I am not sure whether the following behaviour of shlex.split() is correct:
Quote from
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
Hi Serhiy,
I am currently still investigating it for my own project.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37646103/posix-path-1003-1-examples-and-behaviour-for-foo-bar
Currently I do not have the build environment, so I can provide the text, but
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez:
A single value terminated by a comma is assigned to be a tuple, even when
missing parenthesis.
a=(1) => a=1OK/defined as
a=(1,) => a=(1,) OK
a=1, => a=(1,) ???
Is the latter intended?
--
In [4]: a=1,
In [5]: p
New submission from Arno-Can Uestuensoez:
I am currently finishing a file system library and use 'os.path.normpath' for
canonical input into match-operations.
So already found Issue26329 - IEEE-1003.1-Chap 4.2 and written a comment. But I
guess this issue should be handled sepera
Arno-Can Uestuensoez added the comment:
I propose to add at least a statement like e.g. "In conformance to IEEE Std
1003.1™, 2013 Edition; 4.12 Pathname Resolution".
Because I had the same thought of a bug at first view, this because I did not
find any hint in e.g. docs for 2.7
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
First of all, sorry for the late reply.
I did try the solution you have proposed which removes the need to click to
expand the items under globals/locals but as I understand it, you have
something more in mind for the whole stackviewer UI. Should I still submit
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
Come to think of it, maybe I should send both the second and third items in one
patch? I could just call the GetSubList method if the VariablesTreeItem is
being created for locals. Is that a bad approach to take?
Sorry for the sheer number of questions
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
I have also prepared a patch for the second item but I don't know if I should
regenerate the patch after you have committed the first patch so I'm sitting on
it now.
I also didn't update the ACKS and NEWS files, should I?
Here's what I did
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
Alright, here goes my first patch. I just did what you have pointed out :)
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file40213/issue24790.1.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
Thank you very much for your thorough input, it is very much appreciated!
Actually one of the first things that I tried was to return stack[1:] to remove
the target but your suggestion is much better. I did try it and it does work
and I will provide a patch as
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
Hello again,
I have spent some time going over the code and how the PyShell brings all of
this together and have formed some loose opinions on how to solve these issues
but I wanted to get a much more informed opinion.
I will provide a patch for the first one
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
It does indeed, thank you very much! I have signed the Contributor Agreement
and will start working on this right away.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24
Can İbanoğlu added the comment:
Hello,
I'm very interested in tackling this issue but this will be my first
contribution to Python and I'm quite nervous. I have gone over the developer
guide and FAQ but I would appreciate if you could let me know if I should
approach this in a c
New submission from Xue Can <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I hope the official source release can add support for MinGW
to compile python under Win32 platform. And layout built files
like python in Unix-like paltforms.
--
components: Build
messages: 70338
nosy: xuecan
severity: normal
45 matches
Mail list logo