Ethan Glass added the comment:
Thank you so much!
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue27708>
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Ethan Glass added the comment:
As I said in a previous post, the numbers used are not stored. I ran the
algorithm again in the shell with the following result.
>>>433280290620249803021633236737754454961323946176957783683770440633296393153552725399527798
Ethan Glass added the comment:
I actually started with a very small integer, said integer being 14. I then
multiplied it by two large integers(10^100 or higher).I no longer have access
to the two large integers, as they were never stored. When I divided the
product by the two large integers
New submission from Ethan Glass:
Python represents large integers as floating-points, which may or may not be
the cause or part of the cause of division of said large integers evaluating to
a floating-point number usually within a 1-integer range of the correct result.
--
components
