[issue9512] logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler - mode argument not respected

2010-08-23 Thread Friðrik Már Jónsson
Friðrik Már Jónsson added the comment: That's a fair conclusion, but in this case I'd appreciate Terry's suggested doc patch being implemented: DOC PATCH In 15.6.12.5. RotatingFileHandler, replace "If mode is not specified, 'a' is used." with "If mode

[issue9512] logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler - mode argument not respected

2010-08-22 Thread Friðrik Már Jónsson
Friðrik Már Jónsson added the comment: I agree with your points on the triviality and potential harmfulness of allowing modes like 'b' and 'w'. The '+' mode may be required for loggers that require headers or validation or positioning within an existing file (t

[issue9512] logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler - mode argument not respected

2010-08-05 Thread Friðrik Már Jónsson
Friðrik Már Jónsson added the comment: It may not have been entirely obvious that what I meant with the Extended Log File Format example is that read access would be optimal. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9

[issue9512] logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler - mode argument not respected

2010-08-05 Thread Friðrik Már Jónsson
Friðrik Már Jónsson added the comment: Thank you. I should have been more clear about what I meant. This this condition was introduced in r38631 by Vinay Sajip having the log message "Added optional encoding argument to file handlers." I can't easily see why this piece of co

[issue9512] logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler - mode argument not respected

2010-08-04 Thread Friðrik Már Jónsson
New submission from Friðrik Már Jónsson : It seems to me that the ``mode`` keyword argument of ``logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler`` is not respected. Here is an example of opening a nonexistent file:: Python 2.7 (r27:82500, Aug 4 2010, 15:10:49) [GCC 4.3.2] on linux2 Type