Change by Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com>:
--
nosy: +MGilch
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Change by Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com>:
--
resolution: -> rejected
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: -> closed
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bu
Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Steven: Thanks for the advice. Next time I'll follow it
Victor: I'll look into perf
I see that there are maybe problems and agree that we can close the issue and
Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Added sample stdev and variance to the PR
--
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python
Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Population seemed appropriate to me.
I'd define the list of times as a whole "population" that stands for its own.
I should probably add both, the sample and po
Change by Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5076
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com>:
I propose to add a function parameter for timeit to get some statistics back
from it. I think it's inconvenient to write those stubs every time when we have
a method for this in the standard library that could be easil
New submission from Matthias Gilch <matthias.gilch.mg...@gmail.com>:
I've seen that the bytes type does not support bitwise operations, but I think
users would expect that those operations will work.
--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 303464
nosy: MGilch
priority:
