MunSic JEONG added the comment:
Ubuntu 10.4.1 LTS
also work fine with both "UTF8" and "UTF-8"
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10154>
___
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10154>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
r38027 has following changes.
-'utf-8':'UTF-8',
+'utf_8':'UTF8',
subversion log is:
Correct mapping of Python codec name to C encoding name for UTF-8
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
On OSX, _locale.setlocale raise locale.Error with arg 'UTF8' but ok with
'UTF-8'. and setlocale tries to normalize localename with locale.normalize().
and locale.normalize() always change encoding to 'UTF8' (locale.py:646).
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1508475>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10498>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
> Do you have a patch to fix the issue?
no, I don't. I just wanted to move stage from "unittest needed" to "needs
patch" :)
After reading issue8098, now I realized that this is broad issue as belopolsky
said in msg110095.
For ne
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9012>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
Attribute error confirmed on OSX, and py3k.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2371041
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19133/issue7980.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
belopolsky
I am little worried about my words. I made patch against 2.7-maint branch. But
I recognized that patch is not following rules, because of your guidance. Then
I uploaded another patch against py3k branch again. and issue6608-p3k.patch
could be
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7980>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8098>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
I uploaded a patch against py3k branch.
Sorry for many "Added file" and "Removed file" mails. I am learning customs
Trac now.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19004/issue6608-p3k.patch
__
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18987/issue6608-timemodule-2nd.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6608>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18978/issue6608-testcase.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6608>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18976/issue6608-timemodule.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6608>
___
___
Pytho
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
I made patch which move comment from PC/getpathp.c to Doc/using/windows.rst.
And did a little editing, reST markup.
http://codereview.appspot.com/2211046
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18997/comment_move_to_windows_rst.patch
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
--
nosy: +ruseel
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue459007>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
Thank you for a kind guidance.
I uploaded patch with
- function name "checktm"
- add comment above gettmarg
- move comment in "checktm" to (above function signature)
- change comment little bit to mention issue6608
- "{"
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18978/issue6608-testcase.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6608>
___
___
Python-bug
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file18977/issue6608-timemodule.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6608>
___
___
Pytho
Changes by MunSic JEONG :
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18977/issue6608-timemodule.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6608>
___
___
Python-bug
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
As alexandre.vassalotti pointed in msg107596, I added precondition check.
* extracted the range check from time_strftime as "is_valid_tm".
* time_asctime, time_strftime call "is_valid_tm"
* testcase for both asctime and strftime (abbey
MunSic JEONG added the comment:
uploaded patch.
patch could be applied to 2.7-maint and p3k successfuly. single word insert.
--
nosy: +ruseel
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18973/issue9582.patch
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.
24 matches
Mail list logo