Changes by Robert Siemer :
--
nosy: +siemer
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13797>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Robert Siemer :
--
nosy: +siemer
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue23749>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Changes by Robert Siemer :
--
nosy: +siemer
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10817>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Robert Siemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Update for my comment: python2.5.2 does not show that problem.
python2.4.5 did. I repeat, 2.5.2 does not clean up processes which are
still referenced, but it does clean unreferenced ones.
_
Tracker &
Robert Siemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
Bad design stays bad design: the hope that pids don't get reused soon
breaks two assumptions:
1) I don't have to wait() for a child process soon. It's the programs
business.
2) Pids cycle: there are security patches t