Roy Wood added the comment:
Thanks! :-)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Daniel Diniz wrote:
>
> Daniel Diniz added the comment:
>
> @Roy: we can try :)
>
> Patch updated, tests pass. However, keeping the default output and
> adding an option to prettyprint should keep
Roy Wood added the comment:
This patch would be very useful to me, so I'm sad to see it's been
languishing for so long. :-(
Is there any way to encourage the maintainer to merge this into the
current branch?
--
nosy: +rrwood
___
Pyth