Russ Cox added the comment:
> Named Unicode characters eg \N{LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A}
These descriptions are not as stable as, say, Unicode code
point values or language names. Are you sure it is a good idea
to depend on them not being adjusted in the future?
It's certainly nice
Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Alexander Belopolsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
> You don't need to get so defensive. I did not raise a performance
> problem, I was simply responding to Rafael's "AFAIK the lookup on
> dictionaries is faster than on lists" comment. I did not say that you
&g
Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
> Lorenz's patch uses a set, not a list for special characters. Set
> lookup is as fast as dict lookup, but a set takes less memory because it
> does not have to store dummy values. More importantly, use of frozenset
>
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue433024>
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1721518>
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1297193>
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1647489>
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1693050>
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue433030>
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
_
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1662581>
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1160>
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2537>
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
nosy: +rsc
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2636>
__
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
> The loop in escape should really use enumerate
> instead of "for i in range(len(pattern))".
It needs i to edit s[i].
> Instead of using a loop, can't the test just
> use "self.assertEqual(re.esacpe(same
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file10080/re.patch
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.pytho
Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
> It seems that escape is pretty dumb. The documentations says that
> re.escape escapes all non-alphanumeric characters, and it does that
> faithfully. It would seem more useful to have a list of meta-characters
> and just esc
Changes by Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
components: +Regular Expressions
__
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2650>
__
___
Python
New submission from Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
import re
print re.escape("_")
Prints \_ but should be _.
This behavior differs from Perl and other systems: _ is an identifier
character and as such does not need to be escaped.
--
messages: 65585
nosy: rsc
severit
19 matches
Mail list logo