[issue13489] collections.Counter doc does not list added version

2011-11-29 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: It doesn't seem like the styling is the issue, but the placement. You say that the standard style is to put this at the end of the section, is there somewhere it would be appropriate to bring this up for discussion? I think it would be much more intuiti

[issue13489] collections.Counter doc does not list added version

2011-11-26 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Ah, I see, it seems like that would be better suited directly after the section title, don't you? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/is

[issue13489] collections.Counter doc does not list added version

2011-11-26 Thread Shawn Ligocki
New submission from Shawn Ligocki : collections.Counter doc does not list added version: http://docs.python.org/library/collections.html It appears to only have been added in 2.7 (while the rest of the doc says it is valid since 2.4) -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation

[issue10860] Handle empty port after port delimiter in httplib

2011-10-18 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Great! Glad it landed :) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10860> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue10860] Handle empty port after port delimiter in httplib

2011-01-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Here's a patch for 2.7 (from the hg checkout http://code.python.org/hg/branches/release2.7-maint/) How does it look? Apparently there was already a testcase for "www.python.org:" failing! -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://

[issue10861] urllib2 sporadically falsely claims infinite redirect

2011-01-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Ahha, what a mess, thanks for investigating! I agree, this is bankofamerica's problem. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/is

[issue10860] Handle empty port after port delimiter in httplib

2011-01-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Sure, I can work on a patch. Should an empty port default to 80? In other words does "http://foo.com/"; == "http://foo.com:/";? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bug

[issue10861] urllib2 sporadically falsely claims infinite redirect

2011-01-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
New submission from Shawn Ligocki : urllib2 sporadically falsely claims that http://www.bankofamerica.com/ has infinite redirect: $ python -c 'import urllib2; print urllib2.urlopen("http://www.bankofamerica.com/";).geturl()' https://www.bankofamerica.com/ $ python -c &#

[issue10860] urllib2 crashes on valid URL

2011-01-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
New submission from Shawn Ligocki : urllib2 crashes with stack trace on legal URL http://118114.cn Transcript: Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:57:41) [GCC 4.4.3] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2010-01-21 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: ping Please look at the last patch. It's very simple and would be helpful. This is not very complicated and shouldn't take months to consider. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-11-02 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: There is a whole paragraph about WichmanHill at the top of this page already and (if anything) I think that WichmanHill is less notable (basically only used in legacy applications). However SystemRandom is very useful. I don't want to make claims about ur

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-11-02 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: How about this, sweet and simple. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15252/random.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-11-02 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: So, all I really want to do is call attention to SystemRandom from the top of the page, because it is easily not noticed at the bottom. Do you guys have any suggestions for how to do that that doesn't repeat too much and doesn't claim things that

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-11-02 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: I rewrote the description, mostly using the claims form urandom, so that we don't claim something new. What do you guys think? -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15251/random.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-10-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: A major pro for pseudo-random number generators is that they are deterministic, that is, you can save a load the state, start from the same seed and reproduce results, etc. At least in science (and probably other areas) this reproducibility can be vital in a

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-10-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Ah, sorry for the misunderstanding. I agree, better not to mislead. Perhaps we should side with the urandom documentation and say that it is a cryptographically secure random number generator with no accessible state

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-10-07 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Oh, urandom is almost always non-deterministic. It mixes completely random bits from hardware sources with its pseudo-random number state. The more random bits it gets from hardware, the less predictable its output is. However, as long as it's getting any r

[issue7076] Documentation add note about SystemRandom

2009-10-06 Thread Shawn Ligocki
New submission from Shawn Ligocki : I did not notice the existence of random.SystemRandom until after I had implemented my own version. I thought it would be nice to mention it in the opening section. I've added a tiny note about random.SystemRandom. What do you guys think, feel free to r

[issue1727780] 64/32-bit issue when unpickling random.Random

2007-09-17 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: Yep, tested it on a 64-bit machine and 2 32-bit machines and back and forth between them. It seems to resolve the problem. _ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/iss

[issue1727780] 64/32-bit issue when unpickling random.Random

2007-09-17 Thread Shawn Ligocki
Shawn Ligocki added the comment: I've got a patch! The problem was that the state was being cast from a C-type unsigned long to a long. On 32-bit machines this makes large 32-bit longs negative. On 64-bit machines this preserves the sign of 32-bit values (because they are stored in 64-bit