Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
On 6/3/2013 9:33 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti wrote:
Alexandre Vassalotti added the comment:
Stefan, could you address my review comments soon? The improved support for
globals is the only big piece missing from the implementation of PEP, which I
would like
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30216/d0c3a8d4947a.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15642
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mstefanro
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17810
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30211/780722877a3e.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17810
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file30211/780722877a3e.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17810
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
On 5/10/2013 11:46 PM, Stefan Mihaila wrote:
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mstefanro
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17810
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
Hello. I apologize once again for not finalizing my work, but once I have
started my final year of faculty and a job, I have been busy pretty much all
the time. I would really like to finish this as I've really enjoyed working on
it, and everything on PEP
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
Are there also some known techniques on tracking down memory leaks?
I've played around with sys.gettotalrefcount to narrow down
the place where the leaks occur, but they seem to only occur in v4,
i.e. pickle.dumps(3.0+1j, 4) leaks but pickle.dumps(3.0+1j, 3
New submission from Stefan Mihaila:
Here are a few counter-intuitive outputs:
dict.fromkeys is dict.fromkeys
False
id(dict.fromkeys) == id(dict.fromkeys)
True
x=dict.fromkeys; id(x) == id(x)
True
x=dict.fromkeys; id(x) == id(dict.fromkeys)
False
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
--
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15773
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
- I don't really like the idea of changing the semantics of the PUT and GET
opcodes. I would prefer new opcodes if possible.
Well, the semantics of PUT and GET haven't really changed. It's just that the
PUT opcode is not generated anymore and memoization
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
There are still some upcoming changes.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15642
___
___
Python
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
Maybe you can set this issue as the superseder of issue9269, because the
patches there have already been applied here.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15642
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
Maybe we could postpone the review process for a few days
until I fix some known issues
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15642
Stefan Mihaila added the comment:
Only an issue in Python2.
A.B.__qualname__
'A.B'
repr(A.B)
class '__main__.A.B'
--
nosy: +mstefanro
versions: +Python 2.6, Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mstefanro
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1062277
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com added the comment:
Attaching patch for fixing a test and adding better testing of sets.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26539/sets-test.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com added the comment:
I have attached a fix to this issue (and implicitly issue1062277).
This patch allows pickling self-referential sets by implementing a
set.__reduce__ which uses states as opposed to ctor parameters.
Before:
s=set([1,2,3])
s.__reduce__
Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com added the comment:
Richard, yes, I think that would work, I didn't think of using f.__self__'s
type.
You might want to replace
if self is not None and not isinstance(self, types.ModuleType):
with
if self is not None and not isinstance(self
Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com added the comment:
Andrew, thanks for creating a separate issue (the refleak was very rare and I
thought I'd put it in the same place, but now I realize it was a bad idea).
Richard, actually, the isinstance(self, type) check I mentioned earlier would
have
Changes by Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +alexandre.vassalotti, ncoghlan, rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15397
New submission from Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com:
In order to implement pickling of instance methods, a means of separating
the object and the unbound method is necessary.
This is easily done for Python methods (f.__self__ and f.__func__),
but not all of builtins support __func__
Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yes, the patch is at http://codereview.appspot.com/6425052/
The code there also contains some tests I've written for functools.unbind.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26439/unbind_test.patch
Stefan Mihaila mstefa...@gmail.com added the comment:
Doesn't the definition I've added at the end of methodobject.c suffice?
(http://codereview.appspot.com/6425052/patch/1/10) Or should the macro be
removed altogether?
--
___
Python tracker rep
24 matches
Mail list logo
