Change by Thomas Cavalli :
--
resolution: -> works for me
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.or
Change by Thomas Cavalli :
--
title: Tutorial Documentation for 4.7.3.2. Positional-Only Parameters, no "/"
question -> Tutorial Documentation for 4.7.3.2. Positional-Only Parameters,
no "/" question?
___
Change by Thomas Cavalli :
--
title: Tutorial Documentation for 4.7.3.2. Positional-Only Parameters, no "/"
ques -> Tutorial Documentation for 4.7.3.2. Positional-Only Parameters, no
"/" question
___
Python tracker
&
New submission from Thomas Cavalli :
The last sentence of this section seems wrong to me:
"If there is no / in the function definition, there are no positional-only
parameters."
Should this better be:
"If there is no / in the function definition, there are only positional-o
Change by Thomas Cavalli :
--
nosy: thomaspcavalli
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Tutorial Documentation for 4.7.3.2. Positional-Only Parameters, no "/"
ques
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.o
New submission from Thomas Cavalli :
The Division (/) section example uses the commented variable "result" without
it being defined. I am counting 4 numbers, (5.6667, 5, 2, 17), that are called
result. The correct result can be implied but its poor documentation. So,
either chan