Vincenzo Ampolo added the comment:
Have a look to this python dev mailing list thread too:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-July/121123.html
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15
Vincenzo Ampolo added the comment:
On 07/24/2012 04:20 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> R. David Murray added the comment:
>
> Are the nanosecond timestamps timestamps or strings? If they are timestamps
> it's not immediately obvious why you want to convert them to dateti
Changes by Vincenzo Ampolo :
--
versions: +Python 2.7
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15443>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Vincenzo Ampolo added the comment:
This is a real use case I'm working with that needs nanosecond precision
and lead me in submitting this request:
most OSes let users capture network packets (using tools like tcpdump or
wireshark) and store them using file formats like pcap or pcap-ng.
Vincenzo Ampolo added the comment:
On 07/24/2012 01:28 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote:
> I would be interested in an actual use case for this.
Alice has a dataset with nanosecond granularity. He wants to make a
python library to let Bob access the dataset. Nowadays Alice has to
implement her
Changes by Vincenzo Ampolo :
--
components: +Library (Lib) -ctypes
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15443>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
New submission from Vincenzo Ampolo :
As long as computers evolve time management becomes more precise and more
granular.
Unfortunately the standard datetime module is not able to deal with nanoseconds
even if OSes are able to. For example if i do:
print "%.9f" %
