aeros167 added the comment:
For any future issues, is it more appropriate to leave the issue status on
pending until the proposal is approved? This may not apply if the issue was
specifically mentioned or requested by a core developer, but it may be better
to use pending for any original
aeros167 added the comment:
Oh okay, that's fair enough. I can definitely understand that assigning the
current directory as the default does not provide a significant change in
improved functionality, and it is not implicit that os.walk() would use the
current directory as the de
aeros167 added the comment:
Created a new PR which sets the default value of top to the current working
directory. (https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14497)
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37
Change by aeros167 :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +14312
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14497
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from aeros167 :
As a quality of life enhancement, it would beneficial to set a default starting
directory for os.walk() to use when one is not specified. I would suggest for
this to be the system's current working directory.
The implementation would be rather straightfo
aeros167 added the comment:
Created a new PR replacing the deprecated method "random.choose" with
"random.choice" in "test_pkg_import.py"
(https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14466).
--
___
Python tracker
<h
Change by aeros167 :
--
pull_requests: +14283
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14466
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue19
aeros167 added the comment:
> Thanks for the PR, aeros167! BTW, if you want to open a new issue and
> modernize the tests to use importlib directly that would be great!
Sounds good, I'll definitely look into doing that after finishing up this
issue. Was waiting the previous PR t
aeros167 added the comment:
Created a PR for moving and renaming "test_pkimport". An initial approval was
made, now it is awaiting core review
(https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14303).
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bu
Change by aeros167 :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +14127
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/14303
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
aeros167 added the comment:
> Yep, just make sure the tests still pass before and after the change. :)
Sounds good, the first thing I had done before proposing the change was testing
it in an IDE and using some logging to ensure that random.choose and
random.choice were providing the s
aeros167 added the comment:
Decided to start working on this issue, seems like a solid starting point.
After submitting a minor doc contribution, I wanted to also attempt to
contribute to some of the easier enhancement requests.
>From my current assessment, it appears that "test_p
12 matches
Mail list logo