New submission from ganges master:
I'm not sure if it's a bug or just an inconvenience, but when a string
containing \x00 is passed to int/float/etc, they return a misleading exception:
int(abc)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
ValueError
New submission from ganges master gangesmas...@users.sourceforge.net:
Attempting to read from stdout of a running process seems broken on Python3.2.
I've been able to reproduce this on Ubuntu 11.4 and Windows 7 (with /bin/sh
installed as part of git for windows)
Python 3.2 (r32:88445, Dec 8
ganges master gangesmas...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
hmm, it does work when i call flush, but it works perfectly fine without
flushing on python2.x... i guess this has to do with str/bytes again. maybe
this should be documented somewhere? thanks for the tip though
New submission from ganges master gangesmas...@users.sourceforge.net:
the relative-import mechanism is broken... at least on python2.6 but i'd guess
on later versions as well.
consider this package layout:
/tmp/foo/
/tmp/foo/__init__.py
/tmp/foo/bar.py
where bar.py is:
# note
ganges master gangesmas...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
i believe brett is in charge of this, adding him to the noisy. sorry if it's
not you :)
--
nosy: +brett.cannon
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org
New submission from ganges master gangesmas...@users.sourceforge.net:
this is similar to bug #5370, but this for is a different reason. also,
i have seen several sites on google that mention it, so it has happened
to quite a few people.
the bug is that when calling dir() on a object, it looks
ganges master [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
here's a short example of the bug
class Foo(object):
... def __getattr__(self, name):
... return 42
... @property
... def bacon(self):
... return int.lalala
... @property
... def eggs(self):
... return 17
...
f = Foo
New submission from ganges master [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
under python 2.5 (and possibly 2.6 beta), the following code runs
successfully:
def f(**kwargs):
... print kwargs
...
f(a=5,b=7,a=8)
{'a': 8, 'b': 7}
while in python 2.4, it fails as expected (complaining that a is given
twice)
http
