swgmma added the comment:
Just squashed all the commits.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30082>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Change by swgmma :
--
versions: +Python 3.11 -Python 3.8
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30082>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
swgmma added the comment:
Anything else left to do?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30082>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
swgmma added the comment:
Thanks all for the guidance. Have gone back to the original `force_hide` with
the suggested documentation.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30
swgmma added the comment:
What if we change `force_hide` from True/False to something like "off" |
"console" | "all" (defaulting to "off")?
--
___
Python trac
swgmma added the comment:
For users who simply want to hide a process' window and do not have intimate
knowledge of how the window is created by Windows, is it feasible to just have
one option that handles all cases? Or do we have to implement both `force_hide`
and `force_hide_console
swgmma added the comment:
Just added a commit implementing `force_hide_console`.
What is the most trivial way to test it's behaviour?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30
swgmma added the comment:
I implemented your first suggestion for `force_hide`.
Should we add your `force_no_window` suggestion as well?
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30
swgmma added the comment:
Ping in case anyone from the windows team is available to review the PR
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30
Change by swgmma :
--
pull_requests: -18362
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30082>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
Change by swgmma :
--
pull_requests: +18362
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18719
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30
Change by swgmma :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +18361
stage: needs patch -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/19014
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
swgmma added the comment:
> Try running that script with pythonw.exe instead.
That did the trick. Confirmed that the changes are working as intended.
Running the test script posted earlier and adding the new `force_hide` kwarg to
the subprocess call:
With `force_hide=False`, a comm
Change by swgmma :
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +18076
stage: -> patch review
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18719
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from swgmma :
The docs for stat()
(https://docs.python.org/3.9/library/pathlib.html#pathlib.Path.stat) state:
> Return information about this path (similarly to os.stat()). The result is
> looked up at each call to this method."
Nit picks:
1) It states "simi
swgmma added the comment:
Sorry, perhaps I did not word it clearly. Indeed the code to implement this
looks trivial, however the part I am having trouble with is reproducing the
reported issue in the first place.
For example, running the attached file from a command prompt (`python test.py
swgmma added the comment:
I would like to pick up work on this (have started at link below), however I
would like some help:
For testing purposes, could someone please provide a minimum working example of
using subprocess that causes a command prompt to pop up?
I have not been able
Change by swgmma :
--
nosy: +swgmma
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue30082>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.pyth
18 matches
Mail list logo
