[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-03-20 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: Added some test cases for it . -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file21319/patch1.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-03-20 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file21008/help.txt ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-03-05 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: is there any default version in pep 386? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-03-05 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: I am trying for unit tests here , but would need some assistance. I included a file here , please review that. first of all i am not able to access self.data['version'](shows an exception , here). suggest me a solution here . -- Added

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-02-20 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20807/diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsub

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-02-20 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20806/diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-02-20 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: Sorry for the typo. I ran the code though and it worked fine. I guess might have patched a wrong file :( . Made the changes as you asked. Will try for the unit tests :) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20806/diff

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-02-20 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20804/diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11060> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-02-20 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: I guess this needs to be reviewed . Added support for checking version in mkcfg.py by making use of suggest_normalized_version .. (didnt not an error for non matching suggestion , though it will prompt for the version it again ) -- Added file: http

[issue11060] distutils2 sdist does not complain about version that is not PEP 386 compliant

2011-02-19 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: I have gone through the source of mkcfg.py and though of implementing version check by calling distutils2.is_valid_version() and then if it results false , call suggest_normalized_version() to ask the user if he would like the suggested version or enter a new

[issue11205] Evaluation order of dictionary display is different from reference manual.

2011-02-13 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : -- nosy: +swamiyeswanth ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11205> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue11160] ZipFile.comment expects bytes

2011-02-12 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: can we use str.encode() function to convert string into bytes ? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11160> ___ ___

[issue11160] ZipFile.comment expects bytes

2011-02-12 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: IMO the Zipfile.comment should accept strings too instead of just accepting bytes , so patching should help i guess -- nosy: +swamiyeswanth ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11

[issue9364] some problems with the documentation of pydoc

2011-02-06 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20703/site.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9364> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue9364] some problems with the documentation of pydoc

2011-02-06 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20700/site.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9364> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue9364] some problems with the documentation of pydoc

2011-02-06 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: Completely agreed with you on having "Welcome to python 3.2 help!".. made the changes. Uploaded site.py as suggested by you . I will try to create the patch for the links , but i am not sure how to .Could use some help if you can provide me any website l

[issue9364] some problems with the documentation of pydoc

2011-02-06 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20699/pydoc.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9364> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue9364] some problems with the documentation of pydoc

2011-02-06 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file20686/pydoc.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue9364> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue9364] some problems with the documentation of pydoc

2011-02-05 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: Patch for the change i have suggested in pydoc . @Eric I will try to implement the patch suggestions you have made. I still have to figure out how to make crosslinks -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20686/pydoc.diff

[issue9364] some problems with the documentation of pydoc

2011-02-05 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: Suggestions are good . One thing I came across when going through the doc is that when you run help(help) after importing help from pydoc , i noticed that the first line of the help utility is """ Welcome to Python 3.2! This is the online help uti

[issue2650] re.escape should not escape underscore

2011-01-13 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: @James test results for py3k python -m timeit -s "$(printf "import re\ndef escape(s):\n return re.sub('([][.^$*+?{}\\|()])', '\\\1', s)")" 'escape("!@#$%^&*()!@#$%^&*()!@#$%^&*()!@#$%^&*()!@#$%^&a

[issue2650] re.escape should not escape underscore

2011-01-12 Thread yeswanth
yeswanth added the comment: As James said I have written the patch using only regular expressions . This is going to be my first patch . I need help writing the test for it -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue2

[issue2650] re.escape should not escape underscore

2011-01-11 Thread yeswanth
Changes by yeswanth : -- nosy: +swamiyeswanth ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue2650> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: