[issue10303] small inconsistency in tutorial

Senthil Kumaran added the comment: Fixed in r86310. print was used in some examples following its mention, so a simple introduction to it was okay. It is introduced properly further down in the tutorial. -- nosy: +orsenthil resolution: -> fixed stage: needs patch -> committed/rejecte

[issue10303] small inconsistency in tutorial

Kent Johnson added the comment: Attached patch deletes the referenced sentence. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +kjohnson Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19536/issue10303.diff ___ Python tracker _

[issue10303] small inconsistency in tutorial

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: The sentence should be deleted. Print is *not* used in any of the previous examples. This is the first mention of print() in the chapter and is nonsensical in context. -- keywords: +easy nosy: +terry.reedy stage: -> needs patch versions: +Python 2.7,

[issue10303] small inconsistency in tutorial

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.py

[issue10303] small inconsistency in tutorial

New submission from Malte Helmert : Section "3.1.2. Strings" says "*Once again*, the print() function produces the more readable output.", but as far as I can see (or grep), this is the first time that this aspect of print() is mentioned. -- assignee: d...@python components: Documentat